In
Brian McLaren’s latest book, A New Kind of Christianity,
the reader is cordially invited to join the author in a
heretical assault upon God and the Bible. Indeed, as McLaren
enthusiastically demonstrates, it is not possible to attack one
without attacking the other.
Acknowledging the work of
fellow emergent travelers such as Phyllis Tickle, Tony Jones,
and Doug Pagitt, McLaren tells us “something is trying to be
born among those of us who follow Jesus Christ.” (pg.13)
In fact, writes McLaren, “what is trying to be born today echoes
the Great Reformation in many ways.” (pg.257)
But does McLaren’s
paradigm vision really echo the Great Reformation? From the
Reformation came the freedom of Sola Scriptura—the Word
of God alone. The chains of a false religion were cast off. From
the Reformation came men and women who were willing to die
for the right to believe and proclaim Truth.
What does McLaren’s
“reformation” offer? An errant eschatology. A New Age “christ.”
The ascent of homospirituality into the temple. (2 Kings 23: 7)
All made possible, of course, through creative
misinterpretation of God’s Word. The author has brought us
his Great Deformation, a theology that plays to the
flesh even while being portrayed as a spiritual journey.
One of the major themes in
A New Kind of Christianity, homosexuality, cleverly
defines Christians who speak out against the homosexual
lifestyle as suffering from “fundasexuality.” (Pg.174-5)
However, you are only a “fundasexualist” if you speak out loudly
against this sin.
McLaren decrees, “The term
does not apply to the quiet, pious, respectful fundamentalism of
straightforward, sincere people, but rather to the organizing,
angry, dominating fundamentalism that declares war on those who
differ.” (pg. 174-5)
In other words, when it
comes to homosexuality, a good Christian is a silent Christian.
“Woe unto them that
call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light,
and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet and sweet
for bitter.” (Isaiah 5:20)
As my wife and I have both
repented of this particular sin, it is difficult to comprehend
Brian McLaren’s smiley-faced rebellion. But make no mistake:
McLaren and others are being used to facilitate homospirituality,
which may even assume an elevated, even sacred, status.
Ridiculous? Simply look to
the Episcopalians, Lutherans, and Presbyterians. This is just
the beginning.
“For we wrestle not
against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against
powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world,
against spiritual wickedness in high places.
(Ephesians 6:12)
Like Doug Pagitt, Brian
McLaren believes Christians are trapped in a “Greco-Roman”
understanding of the faith. “Now the god of this Greco-Roman
version of the biblical story bears a strange similarity in many
ways to Zeus,” he tells us, which “is a far different deity from
the Jewish Elohim of Genesis 1…” (pg. 42)
Yet, no matter what name
his god is given, you will not find this redesigned deity in the
Old or New Testament. The only way to promote the existence of
this “god” is to radically change biblical interpretation—which
is exactly what the author spends much time and many pages
seeking to accomplish. “There will be no new kind of Christian
faith without a new approach to the Bible,” he opines, “because
we’ve gotten ourselves into a mess with the Bible.” (Pg. 67-68)
In his chapter, ‘What is
the Overarching Storyline of the Bible?’ McLaren notes he and
others have “dared to tweak” the content of the Word of God. “We
might question conventional theories of atonement or the nature
and population of hell or whether concepts like original sin or
total depravity might need to be modified.” (pg. 35)
McLaren does indeed
“modify.” He modifies with a vengeance. Thus this emergent
“Jesus” was never sent by the Father to die in our place for our
sins. There is no substitutionary atonement. There is no
original sin.
The Bible tells us, “I
cried with my whole heart; hear me, O Lord: I will keep thy
statutes.” (Psalm 119: 145)
McLaren believes
traditional understanding of the Word of God has made Christians
a nasty, dominant bunch. We apparently have difficulty with
religious pluralism because of this flawed understanding. On top
of that, Christians “currently control most of the world’s
wealth, consume most of the world’s resources, produce most of
the world’s waste, and sell and use most of the world’s
weapons.” (Pg.215)
As in his other books, in
A New Kind of Christianity McLaren exhibits his ability
and talent to write well and draw readers with his
conversational tone, seemingly measured, with humorous comments
sprinkled in here and there. He gives the impression of allowing
much room to disagree with him. He invites us on a journey,
which he portrays as part of the natural “evolution” of
Christianity.
“The old paradigm falls
away behind us like a point of departure, and we are won over to
new possibilities, caught up in a new way of seeing, looking
toward a new and wide horizon.” (Pg.30) But since the author
does not comprehend the Bible (1 Corinthians 2:14), what
practices does he engage in to gain wisdom and knowledge?
Interestingly, McLaren
identifies himself as a “contemplative/reflexive.” (pg. 226) He
writes, “In the tradition of Julian of Norwich and St. Teresa of
Avila and all the other mystics, we can learn to render
ourselves vulnerable to the “favors of God”—those indescribable
experiences that mock our dualisms and so saturate our
imagination with abundance that they transcend our ability to
convey joy and wonder. In the tradition of St. John of the
Cross, we can learn to survive and derive benefits from the
soul’s dark night.” (pg. 227) Like most leading figures in the
emergent movement, McLaren advocates contemplative spirituality.
A New Kind of
Christianity will serve as a lure for Bible-illiterate
Christians. For believers who know the Word of God, McLaren’s
heresy will sadden and astound. His book is aimed at the young,
and at people who have perhaps grown up in households with
little or no faith. It is aimed at the unsaved and the
uncertain. It is for the disappointed and disenchanted, and for
people who simply know no better. If you have a gripe against
God or His people, this book will lick your wounds. But what
this book will not do is provide any measure of godly hope and
biblical virtue.
Source article:
http://www.lighthousetrailsresearch.com/blog/?s=%22assaulting+truth+with+a+vengeance%22&search=Search