© 2011 Dr. Stanley Monteith - All Rights Reserved
By Dr. Stanley Monteith
Radio Liberty, April, 2011
We need to be informed about the global and spiritual battles that rage around us.
If we don't see the threats, we have little incentive to prepare for the challenges ahead.
The last Radio Liberty letter discussed the origin of World War I. Cecil Rhodes, Alfred Milner, and most of the members of their cabal, were either Masons, or involved in other occult organizations. In addition, a German Mason told the Kaiser the Grand Orient Freemasonic lodge orchestrated the events that led up to the Great War.
I believe both groups were involved, but they were aided by leaders in other nations who were involved in the occult.
What part did the Milner Group (Rhodes' secret society) play? Sir Edward Grey, the British Foreign Secretary, was closely affiliated with the Milner Group; he got Russia and France to sign secret agreements that committed them to join England if there was a major war in Europe. Several years later, when World War I was imminent, Sir Edward Grey denied the existence of the secret agreements because the Cabinet and the British people didn't want to be involved in a European war.
Professor Quigley researched that period. He admired the idealistic goal of the Milner Group (the Cecil Bloc), but they weren't concerned about the consequences of their actions. Professor Quigley wrote (in his book, The Anglo-American Establishment):
"The second generation of the Cecil Bloc was famous at the time.... This group, flitting about from one great country house to another or from one spectacular social event to another in the town houses of their elders, has been preserved for posterity in the auto-biographical volumes of Margot Tennant Asquith....
"The frivolity of this group can be seen in Margot Tennant's statement that she obtained for Milner his appointment to the chairmanship of the Board of Inland Revenue in 1892 merely by writing to Balfour and asking for it after she had a too brief romantic interlude with Milner in Egypt. As a respected scholar of my acquaintance has said, this group did everything in a frivolous fashion including entering the Boer War and the First World War."
Professor Quigley described the terrifying power of the Milner Group:"The influence of Chatham House appears in its true perspective, not as the influence of an autonomous body but as merely one of many instruments in the arsenal of another power. When the influence which the Institute wields is combined with that controlled by the Milner Group in other fields - in education, in administration, in newspapers and periodicals - a really terrifying picture begins to emerge. This picture is called terrifying not because the power of the Milner Group was used for evil ends. It was not. On the contrary, it was generally used with the best intentions....
"The picture is terrifying because such power, whatever the goals at which it may be directed, is too much to be entrusted safely to any group.... No country that values its safety should allow what the Milner Group accomplished in Britain - that is, that a small number of men should be able to wield such power in administration and politics... should be able to exercise such influence over the avenues of information that create public opinion, and should be able to monopolize so completely the writing and the teaching of the history of their own period."
Very little has changed since that time. Cecil Rhodes' secret society incited the Boer War and spawned the Milner Group (1902), the Milner Group spawned the Round Table Group (1909), the Round Table Group incited World War I and spawned the Royal Institute of International Affairs (1919) and the Council on Foreign Relations (1921), and the CFR and the RIIA spawned the Bilderberg Group in 1954, and the Trilateral Commission in 1973. At the present time the organizations (the CFR, the RIIA, the Bilderberg Group, and the TC), have "almost complete control over the publication of the documents relating to their actions," they "exercise.... influence over the avenues of information that create public opinion," and they "monopolize... completely the writing and the teaching of the history of their own period."
How did Sir Edward Grey precipitate the First World War? Kaiser Wilhelm wrote;"Declasse also has a large share in the guilt for the World War, and Grey an even larger share, since he was the spiritual leader of the 'encirclement policy,' which he faithfully pushed forward and brought to completion." 
Dr. Dennis Cuddy researched that period, and wrote:"June 28: Austrio-Hungarian archduke Franz Ferdinand is assassinated, and this serves as the catalyst for the beginning of World War I. On July 20 and 29,  British secretary of state Sir Edward Grey... will make certain statements to the German ambassador to England (Prince Karl Max Lichnowsky) that do not make it clear Britain will enter the conflict (World War I) if Germany goes to war."
Sir Edward Grey devised the "encirclement policy" that led to World War I in 1905. He implemented the policy when he became Foreign Secretary in 1906, and he deceived the Kaiser in 1914 because Grey didn't want the Kaiser to mediate the dispute between Serbia and Austria.
One of the best sources of information on the events that took place at that time is Ambassador Gerard's book, My First Eighty-three Years in America. James Gerard was U.S. Ambassador to Germany in 1914, and, although he wasn't aware of the covert agenda of the Milner Group, he recognized the fact that Sir Edward Grey precipitated the Great War.
Ambassador Gerard wrote:"In this question of the outbreak of war, it must be noted that Sir Edward Grey missed a great opportunity. If, in the beginning, he had told the German Ambassador that England would go to war against Germany.... the world might have been spared a great war - a war which sowed the seeds of another and greater one twenty-five years after."
Austria declared war on Serbia on July 28, Germany invaded Belgium on August 3, and Ambassador Gerard visited Kaiser Wilhelm on August 10. Ambassador Gerard wrote:"Early in August 1914 President Wilson sent me a message through the State Department stating that the United States stood ready at any time to mediate between the warring powers. He directed me to present this proposal to the Emperor in person. An audience with the Emperor (the Kaiser - ed) was arranged for me for the morning of August 10. The Emperor was seated at an iron table in the little garden of the palace in Berlin.... In formal language I made my offer. It was declined. Then the Emperor asked me to sit down and talk to him. . . .
"The Emperor, on one of the few occasions that I saw him in a thoughtful mood, hesitated for a moment and then said slowly, 'No, the coming in of the English has changed the whole situation. They are an obstinate race. They will never stop fighting.'
"After some further discussion the Emperor said he would send a personal message to President Wilson in answer to his offer. He then wrote in pencil, on some large telegraph blanks lying on the table, a personal message to the President.... Of the most historical interest is that part of the message referring to Sir Edward Grey, the British Minister of Foreign Affairs, and the violation of Belgian neutrality.
"The message was as follows:
"For the President of the United States personally:
1. H.R.H. Prince Henry was received by his Majesty King George V in London, who empowered him to transmit to me verbally, that England would remain neutral if war broke out on the Continent involving Germany and France, Austria and Russia. This message was telegraphed to me by my brother from London after his conversation with H.M. the King, and repeated verbally on the twenty-ninth of July."
The King's message convinced Kaiser Wilhelm there wouldn't be a major war, so the Kaiser didn't try to mediate the dispute between Serbia and Austria. Why did the King of England deceive his cousin? The Milner Group, and their supporters, controlled the British government; Lord Asquith was Prime Minister, Sir Edward Grey was Foreign Secretary, Lord Haldane was Secretary of War, and Lord Esher was the King's personal advisor.
Who was Lord Esher? He was one of the four founding members of Cecil Rhodes' secret society, and he was the King's personal advisor. Lord Esher believed the coming war would regenerate the nations of the world. Is that true? I am indebted to Dr. Dennis Cuddy for calling my attention to the following entries in Lord Esher's diary.
On August 3, 1917, Lord Esher wrote in his Journal:"No American is likely to be killed before November. This is unfortunate, as [President] Wilson may require to be steadied before then and only the death of young Americans can ensure him stability."
Later that day Lord Esher wrote a letter to L.B.:"No one can truly say that the sufferings of the world have been in vain; for they have regenerated all nations, and ours in particular. Can there be any doubt but that the war has made for progress and not for retrogression?"
Twenty-one million people died during the Great War; fifty million people were injured. Did that regenerate the world?
Eight days later (August 11, 1917) Lord Esher wrote:"Mr. Henry Morgenthau asked me to call on him....(He) was one of the principal supporters of President Wilson in the campaign for the Presidency, and he possesses the friendship and confidence of the President...
"From the day of his election to the day when America declared war President Wilson and his friends have kept steadily in view the moral regeneration of their country; and it is with this objective before them that, in spite of the horrors of war, they are ready to sacrifice the lives of American citizens. The war appears to these idealists a Crusade....
"Mr. Morgenthau is aware, and he realises the importance upon the morale of the French army and the French people of cementing the Alliance by shedding American blood at the earliest possible moment.
"If many lives have to be sacrificed, the influence upon the American people can only be beneficent."
Ambassador Gerard recorded the Kaiser's message to President Wilson. Kaiser Wilhelm II wrote:"2. My Ambassador in London transmitted a message from Sir E. Grey to Berlin saying that only in case France was likely to be crushed England would interfere."
The King's message and Sir Edward Grey's message convinced the Kaiser there was no danger of a major war, so he didn't try to mediate the dispute. Serbia mobilized during the last week of July, Austria declared war on Serbia on July 28, and I suspect the Masonic movement held key positions in both governments.
Ambassador Gerard recorded Kaiser Wilhelm's message to President Wilson;"3. On the thirtieth my Ambassador in London reported that Sir Edward Grey in course of a 'private' conversation told him that if the conflict remained localized between Russia - not Serbia - and Austria, England would not move, but if we 'mixed' in the fray she would take quick decisions and grave measures; i.e., if I left my ally Austria in the lurch to fight alone England would not touch me." 
At that point, the Kaiser being confused by the conflicting messages, wrote:"4. This communication being directly counter to the King's message to me, I telegraphed to H.M. (the King) on the twenty-ninth or thirtieth, thanking him for [his] kind messages through my brother and begging him to use all his power to keep France and Russia - his Allies - from making any war-like preparations calculated to disturb my work of mediation, stating that I was in constant communication with H.M. the Czar.
"In the evening the King kindly answered that he had ordered his Government to use every possible influence with his Allies to refrain from taking any provocative military measures. At the same time H.M asked me if I would transmit to Vienna the British proposal that Austria was to make Belgrade and a few other Serbian towns a strip of country as a 'main-mise' to make sure that the Serbian promises on paper should be fulfilled in reality. This proposal was in the same moment telegraphed to me from Vienna for London, quite in conjunction with the British proposal; besides, I had telegraphed to H.M. the Czar [the Kaiser's cousin] the same as an idea of mine, before I received the two communications from Vienna and London, as both were of the same opinion."
5. I immediately transmitted the telegrams vice versa to Vienna and London. I felt that I was able to tide the question over and was happy at the peaceful outlook."
The Kaiser tried to mediate the crisis. Why did he fail? The Masons wanted to destroy the European monarchies. The Milner Group wanted to unite the world, and the occult movement wanted to shed the blood of millions of people.
Kaiser Wilhelm continued:"6. While I was preparing a note to H.M. the Czar the next morning, to inform him that Vienna, London and Berlin were agreed about the treatment of affairs, I received the telephones from H.E. the Chancellor that in the night before the Czar had given the order to mobilize the whole of the Russian Army, which was, of course, also meant against Germany; whereas up till then the southern armies had been mobilized against Austria."
Why did the Czar mobilize his army, and precipitate World War I?
Professor Quigley described the events that led to the war:"Serbia, confident of Russian support, answered [Austria] in a reply which was partly favorable, partly evasive, and in one particular at least (use of Austrian judges on Serbian tribunals) negative. Serbia mobilized before making her reply; Austria mobilized against her as soon as it [Serbia's response] was received, and on, July 28th, declared war. The Russian czar, under severe pressure from his generals, issued, retracted, modified, and reissued an order for general mobilization.
"Since the German military timetable for a two-front war provided that France must be defeated before Russian mobilizaton was completed, France and Germany both ordered mobilization on August 1st, and Germany declared war on Russia. As the German armies began to pour westward, Germany declared war on France (August 3rd) and Belgium (August 4th). Britain could not allow France to be defeated, and in addition was morally entangled by the military conversations of 1906-1914 and by the naval agreement of 1912. Moreover, the German challenge on the high seas, in commercial activities throughout the world, and in colonial activities in Africa could not go unanswered.
"On August 4th Britain declared war on Germany, emphasizing the iniquity of her attack on Belgium, although in the Cabinet meeting of July 29th it had been agreed that such an attack would not legally obligate Britain to go to war. Although this issue was spread among the people, and endless discussions ensued about Britain's obligation to defend Belgian neutrality under the Treaty of 1839, those who made the decision saw clearly that the real reason for war was that Britain could not allow Germany to defeat France."
Most historians present that explanation today because they don't realize the Masons and the Milner Group incited the war. Kaiser Wilhelm offered to halt the invasion of France, but Sir Edward Grey ignored the offer.
Kaiser Wilhelm continued:"7. In a telegram from London my Ambassador informed me he understood the British government would guarantee neutrality of France and wished to know whether Germany would refrain from attack. I telegraphed to H.M. the King personally that mobilization being already carried out could not be stopped, but if H.M could guarantee with his armed forces the neutrality of France I would refrain from attacking her, leave her alone and employ my troops elsewhere.
"H.M answered that he thought my offer was based on a misunderstanding; and, as far as I can make out, Sir E. Grey never took my offer into serious consideration. He never answered it. Instead, he declared England had to defend Belgian neutrality, which had to be violated by Germany on strategic grounds, news having been received that France was already preparing to enter Belgium, and the King of Belgians having refused my petition for a free passage under guarantee of his country's freedom. I am most grateful for the President's message." William, H.R. 
Why did the King of England and Sir Edward Grey send the Kaiser conflicting messages? Why didn't Sir Edward Grey accept the Kaiser's offer to halt the invasion of France? Why didn't the King of Belgium give the German army permission to pass through his country? There is a great deal more to this story, but it will have to wait until next month.
What can you do? You can put on the whole amour of God, and stand against the wiles of the wicked people who control our nation because:
Did we in our own strength confide,
Our striving would be losing;
Were not the right Man on our side,
The Man of God's own choosing:
Dost ask who that may be?
Christ Jesus, it is He;
Lord Sabaoth, His name,
From age to age the same,
And He must win the battle.
Barbara and I appreciate your loyal support and your faithful prayers.
Yours in Christ,
Stanley Monteith, Radio Liberty
1. Carroll Quigley, The Anglo-American Establishment, Books in Focus, 1981, p. 31.
2. Ibid., p. 197.
3. Dr. Dennis Cuddy, The Globalists: The Power Elite Exposed, Hearthstone Publishing, P.O. Box 815, Oklahoma City, 2001, p. 32.
4. James W. Gerard, My First Eight-three Years in America, Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1951, p. 218.
5. Carroll Quigley, The Anglo-American Establishment, Books in Focus, New York, 1961, p. 31-32.
6. Viscount Grey of Fallodon, Twenty-Five Years: 1892-1916, Frederick A. Stokes Company, Volume II, New York, 1926, pp. 15-17. See Also: www.answers.com/topic/1st-viscount-edward-grey-grey-of- fallodon
7. Quigley, op. cit., p. 31.
8. Ibid., p. 197.
9. Barry Goldwater, With No Apologies, William Morrow and Company, Inc., 1979, pp. 280-286.
10. Wilhelm II, The Kaiser's Memoirs, Harper & Brothers Publishers, New York, 1922, p. 257.
11. Dr. Dennis Cuddy, op. cit.
12. Bertrand Russell, Autobiography of Bertrand Russell, Routledge, New York, 1967, p. 156.
13. James W. Gerard, op. cit., p. 255.
14. Ibid., p. 217.
16. Reginald Esher, Journals and Letters of Reginald Viscount Esher, Ivor, Nicholson and Watson, London, 1938, pp. 131-132.
17. Ibid., pp. 133 and 135.
18. Gerard, op. cit., p. 218.
20. Ibid., 218-219.
22. Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time, The Macmillan Company, New York, 1966, p. 225.
23. Gerard, op. cit., pp. 219-220.
24. Martin Luther, cited by Stanley Monteith, Brotherhood of Darkness, Hearthstone Publishing, 20
© 2011 Dr. Stanley Monteith - All Rights Reserved
Dr. Stanley Monteith has been studying the movement to create a world government for almost 40 years. During his 35-year career as an orthopedic surgeon he traveled to Europe, lived in South Africa, and researched the records of the men and the organizations that are working to bring our nation under the control of a corporate elite.
Dr. Monteith currently spends five hours daily on talk radio across the nation. He writes extensively, and lectures on geopolitics. He is the author of AIDS: The Unnecessary Epidemic and his most recent book Brotherhood of Darkness is in its 8th printing.
RADIO LIBERTY, P.O. BOX 969, SOQUEL, CA. 95073 -- 800-544-8927
Web-Site: www.radioliberty.com E-Mail: DoctorStanRadio@aol.com
Source article at Radio Liberty: www.radioliberty.com/nlaug10.html
Previous articles in this series: The Secret Cabal - Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 4