|
|
Now that “bail-ins” have become accepted practice all over the planet, no bank
account and no pension fund will ever be 100% safe again. In fact, Cyprus-style
wealth confiscation is already starting to happen all around the world. As you
will read about below, private pension funds were just raided by the government
in Poland, and a “bail-in” is being organized for one of the largest banks in
Italy. Unfortunately, this is just the beginning. The precedent that was set
in Cyprus is being used as a template for establishing bail-in procedures in New
Zealand, Canada and all over Europe. It is only a matter of time before we see
this exact same type of thing happen in the United States as well. From now on,
anyone that keeps a large amount of money in any single bank account or
retirement fund is being incredibly foolish.
Let’s take a look at a few of the examples of how Cyprus-style wealth
confiscation is now moving forward all over the globe…
Poland
For years, there have been rumors that someday the U.S. government would raid
private pension funds.
Well, in Poland
it just happened.
According to
Reuters,
private pension funds were raided in order to reduce the size of the government
debt…
Poland said on Wednesday it will transfer to the state many of the assets held
by private pension funds, slashing public debt but putting in doubt the future
of the multi-billion-euro funds, many of them foreign-owned.
The Polish government is doing the best that it can to make this sound like some
sort of complicated legal maneuver, but the truth is that what they have done is
stolen private assets without giving any compensation in return…
The Polish pension funds’ organisation said the changes may be unconstitutional
because the government
is taking private assets away from them
without offering any compensation.
Announcing the long-awaited overhaul of state-guaranteed pensions, Prime
Minister Donald Tusk said private funds within the state-guaranteed system would
have their bond holdings transferred to a state pension vehicle, but keep their
equity holdings.
He said that what remained in citizens’ pension pots in the private funds will
be gradually transferred into the state vehicle over the last 10 years before
savers hit retirement age.
Iceland
For years, Iceland has been applauded for how they handled the last financial
crisis. But now it is being proposed that the “blanket guarantee” that
currently applies to all bank accounts should be
reduced to 100,000 euros. Will this open the door for
“haircuts” to be applied to bank account balances above that amount?…
Following the crisis in October 2008, Iceland’s government declared all deposits
in domestic financial institutions were ‘blanket’ guaranteed – an Emergency Act
that was reafrmed twice since. However, according to RUV, the finance minister
is proposing to
restrict this guarantee to only
deposits less-than-EUR100,000. While some might see
the removal of an ’emergency’ measure as a positive, it is of course
sadly reminiscent
of the European Union “template” to haircut large depositors.
This is coincidental (threatening) timing given the current stagnation of talks
between Iceland bank creditors and the government over haircuts and lifting
capital controls – which have restricted the outflows of around $8 billion.
Europe
European finance ministers have agreed to a plan that would make “bail-ins” the
standard procedure for rescuing “too big to fail” banks in the future. The
following is how
CNN
described this plan…
European Union finance ministers approved a plan Thursday for dealing with
future bank bailouts, forcing bondholders and shareholders to take the hit for
bank rescues ahead of taxpayers.
The new framework requires bondholders, shareholders and large depositors with
over 100,000 euros to be first to suffer losses when banks fail. Depositors with
less than 100,000 euros will be protected. Taxpayer funds would be used only as
a last resort.
What this means is that if you have over 100,000 euros in a bank account in
Europe, you could lose every single bit of the unprotected amount if your bank
collapses.
Italy
As
Zero
Hedge reported on Tuesday, a “bail-in” is now being
organized for the oldest bank in Italy…
Recall that three weeks ago we warned that “Monti
Paschi Faces Bail-In As Capital Needs Point To Nationalization”
although we left open the question of “who will get the haircut including senior
bondholders and depositors…. given the small size of sub-debt in the capital
structures.” Today, as many expected on the day following the German elections,
the dominos are finally starting to wobble, and as we predicted, Monte Paschi,
Italy’s oldest and according to many, most insolvent bank, quietly commenced a
bondholder “bail in” after it said that it suspended interest payments on three
hybrid notes following demands by European authorities that bondholders
contribute to the restructuring of the bailed out Italian lender. Remember what
Diesel-BOOM said about Cyprus –
that it is a template?
He wasn’t joking.
As
Bloomberg reports, Monte Paschi “said in a statement that
it wont pay interest on about 481 million euros ($650 million) of outstanding
hybrid notes issued through MPS Capital Trust II and Antonveneta Capital Trusts
I and II.” Why these notes? Because hybrid bondholders have zero protections and
zero recourse. “Under
the terms of the undated notes, the Siena, Italy-based lender is allowed to
suspend interest without defaulting and doesnt have to make up the missed
coupons when payments resume.” Then again hybrids, to
quote the Dutchman, are just the template for the balance of the bank’s balance
sheet.
Why is this happening now? Simple: the Merkel reelection is in the bag, and the
EURUSD is too high (recall
Adidas’
laments from last week). Furthermore, if the ECB proceeds
with another LTRO as many believe it will, it will force the EURUSD even higher,
surging from even more unwanted liquidity. So what to do? Why stage a small,
contained crisis of course. Such as a bail in by a major Italian bank. The good
news for now is that depositors are untouched. Unfortunately, with depositor
cash on the wrong end of the (un)secured liability continuum it is only a matter
of time before those with uninsured deposits share some of the Cypriot pain.
After all, in the brave New Normal insolvent world, “it is only fair.”
Fortunately, it does not appear that this particular bail-in will hit private
bank accounts (at least for now), but it does show that European officials are
very serious about applying bail-in procedures when a major bank fails.
New Zealand
The New Zealand government has been discussing implementing a “bail-in” system
to deal with any future major bank failures. The following comes
from a New Zealand news source…
The National Government are pushing a Cyprus-style solution to bank failure in
New Zealand which will see
small depositors lose some of their
savings to fund big bank bailouts, the Green Party
said today.
Open Bank Resolution (OBR) is Finance Minister Bill Englishs favoured option
dealing with a major bank failure. If a bank fails under OBR, all depositors
will have their savings reduced overnight to fund the banks bail out.
“Bill English is proposing a
Cyprus-style solution
for managing bank failure here in New Zealand – a solution that will see small
depositors lose some of their savings to fund big bank bailouts,” said Green
Party Co-leader Dr Russel Norman.
“The Reserve Bank is in the final stages of implementing a system of managing
bank failure called Open Bank Resolution. The scheme will put all bank
depositors on the hook for bailing out their bank.
“Depositors will overnight have their savings shaved by the amount needed to
keep the bank afloat.”
Canada
Incredibly, even Canada is moving toward adopting these “bank bail-ins”. In a
previous article, I explained that “bail-ins” were even
part of the new Canadian government budget…
Cyprus-style “bail-ins” are actually proposed in the new Canadian government
budget. When I first heard about this I was quite skeptical, so I went and
looked it up for myself. And guess what? It is right there in black and white
on
pages
144 and 145 of “Economic Action Plan 2013” which the
Harper government has already submitted to the House of Commons. This new
budget actually proposes “to implement a ‘bail-in’ regime for systemically
important banks” in Canada. “Economic Action Plan 2013” was submitted
on
March 21st, which means that this “bail-in regime” was
likely being planned long before the crisis in Cyprus ever erupted.
So what does all of this mean for us?
It means that the governments of the world are eyeing
our money
as part of the solution to any future failures of major banks.
As a result, there is no longer any truly “safe” place to put your money.
One of the best ways to protect yourself is to spread your money around. In
other words, don’t put all of your eggs in one basket.
If you have your money a bunch of different places, it is going to be much
harder for the government to grab it all.
But if you don’t listen to the warnings and you continue to keep all of your
wealth in one giant pile somewhere, don’t be surprised when you get wiped out in
a single moment someday.