 |
|
“The laws of nature
are the laws of God, Whose authority can be superseded by no power
on earth. A legislature must not obstruct our obedience to Him from
Whose punishment they cannot protect us, all human constitutions
which contradict His laws, we are in conscience bound to disobey.”
George Mason, Founding Father, statesman, 1772,When people talk about the
“separation of church and state,” they mistakenly believe that such
means that those who represent us should leave their religious beliefs
at the door as they enter our institutions of government. Nothing could
be further from the truth. In reading the writings of our Founding
Fathers, it becomes very apparent that they believed those who
represented the people in the halls of government should be men of
religious belief, Godly men who deliberated, according to God’s word, as
the Higher Authority….This brings me to the
present day and the current sad situation in America. On August 22,
2013,
Judicial Watch announced“ that it has
obtained educational materials from the Department of Defense
(DOD) depicting conservative organizations as ‘hate groups’ and
advising students to be aware that ‘many extremists will talk of
individual liberties, states rights, and how to make the world a
better place.‘ The documents repeatedly cite the
leftwing
Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) as a resource for identifying
‘hate groups.'”In reading the document,
which is a training document for all “first duty station” personnel, it
becomes apparent that what Judicial Watch is really referring to in the
use of the term “conservative”, in context, is those who believe, like
myself, in the Constitution and Bill of Rights; in context “leftwing”,
especially in reference to the SPLC, is a group that does not believe in
the Constitution and Bill of Rights as written, only as interpreted.You can download your own
copy of the document at the link above.The document, on page 35,
defines “extremist” as,a person who
advocates the use of force or violence; advocates supremacist causes
based on race, ethnicity, religion, gender, or national origin; or
otherwise engages to illegally deprive individuals or groups of
their civil rights.The document then goes on,
on page 45, to state,“many extremists
will talk of individual liberties, states rights, and how to
make the world a better place.This further defines the
true meaning of the term “extremist”.The document cinches the
meaning, on page 43,In U.S. history,
there are many examples of extremist ideologies and movements.
The colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule
and the Confederate states who sought to secede from the
Northern states are just two examples.In other words, according to
this document, our Founding Fathers were extremists, ergo, the
Constitution and Bill of Rights are extremist doctrine that we should
set aside and ignore. Furthermore, those who believe in the Constitution
and Bill of Rights are extremists.And, of course, by
extension, this document paints anyone who believes in God as the
Creator, the Higher Authority, who believes in the Bible and Natural
Law, as an extremist. This was never the intent of our Founding Fathers
who knew that the only religion, under which people could truly be free,
was Christianity. And they were right, all other religions, whether
humanism, atheism, agnosticism, or the bevy of other religions that
believe in a godhead, are self-destructive and/or oppressive.How far we have come from
the work of our Founding Fathers.Which brings us to what is
very obviously not in the aforementioned DOD training documentWhile the
document does make reference to 9/11, does make reference to the Sudan,
both as “historical events” (page 44-45), there is not one mention of
Islamic extremism!This, in turn, brings us to
recent events linking the man currently occupying our White House
illegally (as he is not natural born),
Barack Hussein Obama, and the Muslin Brotherhood, a radical
extremist Islamic fundamentalist terrorist organization!It is very important, given
the information above, that people go to the website,
Walid Shoebat, and
they read every report found there, especially those found
here and
here. As with any “watchman on the wall,” Walid Shoebatwho openly
admits to having been a member of the Muslim Brotherhood, who openly
names relatives still active in that organizationis being called a “tin
foil hat.” How many of us, who have exposed the inner workings of
systems philosophy have been called the same thing? Yet we weren’t
wrong, as time proved.The reports on Shoebat’s
website outline the connections between Barack Obama and the radical
Islamic terrorist organization, The Muslim Brotherhood. Remember
when Michelle Bachmann wrote
the 16-page letter to Rep. Keith Ellison about the infiltration of
the U.S. Government by members of the Muslim Brotherhood; remember the
attack on her by various talking heads who claimed it wasn’t true,
including Obama lap-dog, John McCain? While McCain and the rest never
produced one iota of evidence to disprove Bachmann’s allegations, anyone
who claimed she was wrong was given access to a microphone.Michelle Bachmann was more
than right in her assertions. And one
Muslim Brotherhood infiltrator, into the executive branch of our
government, is Huma Abedin, wife of the former New York
Representative who likes to expose himself to women Anthony Weiner.
Abedin has been a close associate of Hillary Rodham Clinton since
1996, then her top aide as Secretary of State. Huma Abedin, her brother,
her mother and her father (now deceased) not only have direct ties to
the Muslim Brotherhood but also to Al Qaeda, the spawn of the
Muslim Brotherhood. It is now known that a branch of Al Qaeda and
the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood were involved in the Benghazi embassy
massacre.Many will say, “How is it
possible that a member of the Muslim Brotherhood (Abedin) could marry a
Jew when such is forbidden under Islamic Law?” Westerners (called
“infidels” by Muslims) are very ignorant about the Muslim culture.
Muslims practice what is known as Muruna which is defined
thusly,Is it
permissible, then, to have alliances with powers that are
non-Muslim? Can Muslims work in banks that practice usury? For
the young Muslims they should not leave their jobs in banks and
insurance agencies despite their work being evil, since their
experience in these agencies would gain experience for what
would benefit the Muslim commerce whoever examines the issues
in light of the Doctrine of Balance would find that entry into
these arenas is not merely a project, but a preference and a
duty. (source,
page 19)In other words, Abedin can
marry a Jew “for an interest.” In Abedin’s case, that “interest” could
be in making it appear that she is not a radical Muslim in the interests
of her position as top aide to Hillary Rodham Clinton; but
considering that Abedin is a radical Muslim, state secrets would more
likely be her “interest.” Abedin could not have possibly gotten a
security clearance had she been vetted. Walid Shoebat questions whether
she was and no proof exists that she was.Think about the implications
of this with regard to the claim that has been made that it was not
Osama bin Laden (no proof has been provided that it was, government
claims notwithstanding) who was killed at the compound in Pakistan. Even
though Muruna allows for the sacrifice of Muslims, for the
cause, bin Laden was too important a player to have been sacrificed,
unless he had become a liability to Al Qaeda, of which there is no
indication. To sacrifice a look-alike, however, would serve to focus the
efforts of Al Qaeda.The documents also talk about the Muslim “grand plan” for the
take-over of the world. A scary thought, but they are bringing it
about in country after country, first demanding that their religious
beliefs and religious law be honored within the legal and cultural
institutions of that country, then slowly usurping existing law with
Sharia
Islamic law based on the “absolute law of Allah.” We have already
seen instances in which American courts have observed Sharia law,
instances where taxpayers have been forced to provide accommodation
for Muslim practices in schools and universities, instances in
public places, like airports, where the same is true.Remember the Muslim sect that wanted to build a mosque on a piece of
property in Texas and demanded the
pig farmer next door move his operation, even though the
farmerand the pigswere there long before the Muslims bought the
land next door? They are seeking accommodation. If they get it, it
won’t end there.There is a very real threat to America. At the pinnacle is Barack H
Obama who is not legally our president. It continues with people to
who he is giving access; to the people with whom he associates; to
the people with whom he is connected including his own brother,
uncle and first cousin, all powerful players in the Muslim
Brotherhood.These people are a real threat to our way of life, not those who
believe in the Constitution and Bill of Rights. Yet you will not
find them listed anywhere by the SPLC or any other organization that
does not believe in the Constitution and Bill of Rights.That, alone, should be a heads-up to us all.
I encourage everyone, reading this, to find out for yourself, the
extent to which the Muslim Brotherhood has infiltrated the
government of our country. It is imperative that you do so.© 2013 Lynn M. Stuter – All
Rights Reserved
See also
Common Core The Qatar Connection:
Connect all Schools