Don’t fall for this Trojan Horse legislation, Centralization is the
objective
Media Shield Law is armor for the autocrats
September 16, 2013
http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/archives/9482#more-9482
The innocuously sounding Media Shield Law, also referred to as a
bill to provide the free flow of information to the public, is
not what it is presented to be. It is an integral plank of the
Progressives and Globalists who have been advancing the Communist agenda
for decades, using it to ultimately seek control under global
governance.The bill, should it become law, will have a chilling
effect on free speech, especially any negative discourse against the
people in power, their policies and plans. Everyone needs to pay very
close attention to this bill and take a stand to assure its defeat.Instead of offering legal protections to journalists and
their confidential sources who expose governmental corruption, this law
will provide the legal means long sought by the Executive branch to
instead compel journalists to identify their sources based on a fluid
and arbitrary definition of national security and the narrow
definition of a journalist. It is a direct attack on the First
Amendment and a stealth attack against political dissidence. It is a
stepping stone to the reimplementation of the Fairness Doctrine and a
step toward controlling the information accessible on the internet.Media oligopoly refined
By definition, an oligopoly is a condition where just a
few firms dominate a certain market. Over the last few decades, weve
seen media oligopoly in action. Today, about a half-dozen media
conglomerates dominate what is known as the mainstream media, thereby
allowing much easier control over the content of the news and
editorials. A virtual monopoly is created, and what is aired as news is
better controlled by those in control of licensing. By adding the
nebulous factor of national security as we have seen in many other
instances within our society, America is at risk of losing any remaining
freedom of the press that once existed.Centralization is the objective
Currently, forty-eight-(48) states and the District of
Columbia have enacted shield laws or some form of a shield law,
protecting a reporters privilege to keep sources confidential. Why is
the federal government pushing so hard to usurp states rights and
redefine what has already been established? Its to control information
and those who disseminate it. Instead of reinforcing ones First
Amendment rights under the U.S. Constitution, they are being redefined
under an oligarchy of an elite royalty.The First and Second Amendments of the U.S. Constitution
are inextricably linked, each dependent upon the other. One needs not to
look any farther than the recent attacks on the Second Amendment to see
their plans for the First Amendment. For example, each state has gun
laws which they enforce, however they are under asymmetrical attack by
the federal government for the purposes of control and enforcement, and
ultimately registration and confiscation. By removing the protections
afforded by the Second Amendment, there will be little ability to
exercise your rights under the First Amendment. By hobbling the First
Amendment, there will be little discourse permitted about the Second.It is absolutely critical that people take a few steps
back and look at the larger picture, as these issues are not confined to
a vacuum. Its all about centralization, which provides the ability for
complete control of our lives. Examples of centralization in the U.S.
are plentiful, from the modern income tax statutes of 1913 to the
Affordable Health Care Act that will dominate one-sixth of our national
economy. ObamaCare is not about health care, but about centralization
of power and control. Correspondingly, the federal Media Shield Law is
not about protecting journalists or the prevention of disclosing
classified information, but about centralizing the authority to control
the dissemination of information that is inconvenient to the oligarchy.Additionally, the same people who rely on Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) requests to expose government corruption are the
same people who will fall all over themselves to promote this feigned
treaty of cooperation between the oligarchs and the unwashed. While they
chase their tails over papers peppered in black that tell nothing to
those requesting the truth, the people in power chuckle at the sideshow
while advancing their objectives. They are doubling down to prevent the
exposure of their nefarious plans of subjugating the worlds populace to
global domination, and have no intention of disclosure.You dont have to believe me, though. Instead, let the
words of David Rockefeller, talking at the June, 1991 Bilderberger
meeting in Baden, Germany speak for themselves:We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New
York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose
directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of
discretion for almost forty years.It would have been impossible for us to develop our
plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of
publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated
and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational
sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely
preferable to the national auto determination practiced in past
centuries.Dont fall for this Trojan Horse legislation. Make your
voices heard before they are silenced.Referenced legislation
H.R. 1962: Free Flow of Information Act of 2013
Text
May 14, 2013S. 987: Free Flow of Information Act of 2013
Text
May 16, 2013;On Thursday, 12 September 2013, the Senate Judiciary
Committee passed the media shield law bill with the Feinstein-Durbin
amendment by a vote of 13-5.eld Law, also referred to as a bill to provide the free
flow of information to the public, is
not what it is presented to be. It is an integral plank of the
Progressives and Globalists who have been advancing the Communist agenda
for decades, using it to ultimately seek control under global
governance.The bill, should it become law, will have a chilling
effect on free speech, especially any negative discourse against the
people in power, their policies and plans. Everyone needs to pay very
close attention to this bill and take a stand to assure its defeat.Instead of offering legal protections to journalists and
their confidential sources who expose governmental corruption, this law
will provide the legal means long sought by the Executive branch to
instead compel journalists to identify their sources based on a fluid
and arbitrary definition of national security and the narrow
definition of a journalist. It is a direct attack on the First
Amendment and a stealth attack against political dissidence. It is a
stepping stone to the reimplementation of the Fairness Doctrine and a
step toward controlling the information accessible on the internet.Media oligopoly refined
By definition, an oligopoly is a condition where just a
few firms dominate a certain market. Over the last few decades, weve
seen media oligopoly in action. Today, about a half-dozen media
conglomerates dominate what is known as the mainstream media, thereby
allowing much easier control over the content of the news and
editorials. A virtual monopoly is created, and what is aired as news is
better controlled by those in control of licensing. By adding the
nebulous factor of national security as we have seen in many other
instances within our society, America is at risk of losing any remaining
freedom of the press that once existed.Centralization is the objective
Currently, forty-eight-(48) states and the District of
Columbia have enacted shield laws or some form of a shield law,
protecting a reporters privilege to keep sources confidential. Why is
the federal government pushing so hard to usurp states rights and
redefine what has already been established? Its to control information
and those who disseminate it. Instead of reinforcing ones First
Amendment rights under the U.S. Constitution, they are being redefined
under an oligarchy of an elite royalty.The First and Second Amendments of the U.S. Constitution
are inextricably linked, each dependent upon the other. One needs not to
look any farther than the recent attacks on the Second Amendment to see
their plans for the First Amendment. For example, each state has gun
laws which they enforce, however they are under asymmetrical attack by
the federal government for the purposes of control and enforcement, and
ultimately registration and confiscation. By removing the protections
afforded by the Second Amendment, there will be little ability to
exercise your rights under the First Amendment. By hobbling the First
Amendment, there will be little discourse permitted about the Second.It is absolutely critical that people take a few steps
back and look at the larger picture, as these issues are not confined to
a vacuum. Its all about centralization, which provides the ability for
complete control of our lives. Examples of centralization in the U.S.
are plentiful, from the modern income tax statutes of 1913 to the
Affordable Health Care Act that will dominate one-sixth of our national
economy. ObamaCare is not about health care, but about centralization
of power and control. Correspondingly, the federal Media Shield Law is
not about protecting journalists or the prevention of disclosing
classified information, but about centralizing the authority to control
the dissemination of information that is inconvenient to the oligarchy.Additionally, the same people who rely on Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) requests to expose government corruption are the
same people who will fall all over themselves to promote this feigned
treaty of cooperation between the oligarchs and the unwashed. While they
chase their tails over papers peppered in black that tell nothing to
those requesting the truth, the people in power chuckle at the sideshow
while advancing their objectives. They are doubling down to prevent the
exposure of their nefarious plans of subjugating the worlds populace to
global domination, and have no intention of disclosure.You dont have to believe me, though. Instead, let the
words of David Rockefeller, talking at the June, 1991 Bilderberger
meeting in Baden, Germany speak for themselves:We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New
York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose
directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of
discretion for almost forty years.It would have been impossible for us to develop our
plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of
publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated
and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational
sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely
preferable to the national auto determination practiced in past
centuries.Dont fall for this Trojan Horse legislation. Make your
voices heard before they are silenced.Referenced legislation