by Jeremy James
|
|
Thomas Nelson provides a platform for New Age theology
The
publisher Thomas Nelson effectively declared war on true Biblical Christianity
when it decided to publish and promote the writings of the modern contemplative
mystic, Sarah Young, whose popular book, Jesus Calling, has sold
several million copies. The following analysis demonstrates just how subversive
this book really is.
Approach by this review
A detailed examination of the errors
throughout her book would require several hundred pages. Therefore, we have
restricted our analysis to a representative set of her devotions only, namely
those relating to the tenth of each month.
The impression given throughout her
book is that the person speaking is Jesus. The devotions are presented, not as a
compilation of her own personal reflections, where an entity called Jesus is
employed as a literary device, but as actual messages dictated to her by
Jesus. While she does not claim that her messages have the same weight as
Scripture, each is understood by her to constitute a divine communication. She
confirms this in her Introduction when she states:
…I knew these writings were not inspired as Scripture
is, but they were helping me grow closer to God…This practice of listening
to God has increased my intimacy with Him more than any other spiritual
discipline, so I want to share some of the messages I have received. [emphasis
added]
There is no gentle way to review a
book like this. It makes astonishing claims and must therefore be subject to the
most rigorous test of authenticity. If it passes the test were that possible
then we can rejoice, but should it fail then it must be exposed as a dangerous
occult concoction that will harm all who trust in it.
The
Scripture references provided by Ms Young beneath each of her devotions, usually
2-3 in number, are intended by her to provide additional depth or otherwise to
support the truth of her message. Tellingly she never gives the actual text of
these verses, but we will include them here (from the KJV) to illustrate just
how far she actually departs from the Scripture that she refers to.
|
Psalm 56:3-4What time I am afraid, I praise his word, in God I what flesh can do unto
Matthew 6:20-21But lay up for yourselves neither not there
|
Comment
These verses
of Scripture do not support what Ms Young is saying. Rather they show that this
life and the next are entirely different, having two separate treasuries. She
makes the one treasury applicable to both, where some of ones heavenly store
may be drawn down in this life for days of trouble. This is suspiciously
similar to the Roman Catholic treasury of grace, where believers accumulate
merit through their good works, until one day they have earned enough to cancel
out all their sins.
This
devotion also treats faith or trust as a substance that one can accumulate. This
too is false. Some heretical teachings today, such as Word Faith, teach the same
error.
Conclusion:
This devotion is seriously misleading.
Extract from
|
Luke 10:41-42And Jesus answered and thou thing which
Psalm 32:8I will instruct thee and shalt
|
|
|
Comment
These verses
do not support what Ms Young is saying. Jesus was physically present with
Mary and Martha, but no believer today is with Jesus in the same way. Jesus is
physically today at the right hand of the Father. He will not return to
earth again until the
End
Time. Before he ascended into heaven, Jesus said he
would send another Comforter. This was the Holy Spirit, the vicar of Christ on
earth, who dwells in every born-again believer. We address our Father in heaven
in the name of his wonderful Son by the power of the Holy Spirit dwelling in us.
As Psalm
32:8 [above] makes clear, the guidance we receive from our Father is
not based on dialogue. Rather the Psalm as a whole is saying that we will
know what we ought to do to please Him when we repent of our sins and rejoice in
our salvation. How He instructs us (apart from His Holy Word) is not
stated here, neither is it revealed anywhere else in Scripture.
Ms Young is
seriously confused. By her own admission, her relationship with God is based on
a mystical presence or an inner voice that speaks to her, but Scripture never
directs the believer to order his relationship with the LORD on that basis.
What is
more, Ms Young fails to alert her readers to the dangers of demonic deception.
In fact, in presenting her 366 mystical devotions, she never provides evidence
of any kind that she herself performed the test of the spirits in 1 John 4:
Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits
whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the
world. Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus
Christ is come in the flesh is of God: And every spirit that confesseth not that
Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of
antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is
it in the world. (1 John 4:1-3)
The absence of basic discernment in
this book is both inexplicable and inexcusable. John warned that the spirit of
antichrist is already at work in the world. The antichrist spirit does not
simply oppose Christ, but wherever possible it also seeks to take his place.
This spirit is at its most dangerous when it is offering a beguiling counterfeit
of the gospel while leading its victims to perdition.
Conclusion:
This devotion is seriously misleading.
|
|
Extract from March
|
Psalm 37:23-24The steps of a good man and he delighteth in his for the LORD upholdeth
Psalm 18:30As for God, his way is the word of the LORD is he is a buckler to all
|
Comment
This
devotion is saying that God has created a perfect day for each one of us. It is
also saying that we should be responsive to it, watching out for signs of all
that God is doing for our benefit.
The
Scripture cited does not support what Ms Young is saying. Gods ways are
perfect, but this world is not perfect. It is sin damaged and groaning under the
weight of mans sinful rebellion. Despite the awful condition of the world and
mans fallen state, God graciously condescends to guide all who look to him and
trust in him. Even if a person endures suffering along the way, he can be
assured that God is watching over him and guiding his steps in ways that he
cannot understand.
The suggestion that man will see the
perfect hand of God in his life if he lives in a responsive mode is not taught
in Scripture. Our relationship with God is based on faith and prayer, not on
signs of any kind, or on evidence of his involvement in the small details of our
personal lives. If the Book of Job teaches anything it teaches that man should
never lean on outward evidence of Gods faithfulness and mercy. Faith alone is
the foundation for our relationship with God, not his most tender concern for
the details of our lives.
Conclusion:
This devotion is seriously misleading.
|
|
Extract from April
|
Jeremiah 17:7Blessed and whose hope the LORD
Romans 8:28And love God, to them who are
Psalm 40:2He and set my feet upon a
1 Peter 2:9But ye are a chosen a peculiar people; that hath called you out of
|
Comment
This is an astonishing statement by Ms
Young (or her invisible friend), a statement that lies at the very heart of the
New Age movement. Sin is treated as a misdemeanor and placed on a par with our
mistakes. To say that sin can be recycled is to fail utterly to depict its
true nature. There is nothing in sin that can be salvaged. It results only in
death. And every sin must be paid for in full. Believers are greatly blessed
beyond measure because Christ has paid our sin debt for us. But he did not use
his transforming grace to recycle it.
To suggest
that this is possible is to mock what Christ achieved for each one of us on the
cross. Sin is so devastating that it led immediately to the fall of all mankind.
By trivializing it in this way, Ms Young is playing right into the hands of the
New Age movement,
where
sin is reduced to karma, an amoral act in an amoral
universe, with no absolute implications whatever.
The verses
selected by Ms Young to support her devotion have no relevance to the point
she is making.
Conclusion:
This devotion is a grotesque distortion of Biblical truth.
|
|
Extract from May 10
View problems as opportunities to rely more fully on
|
John 15:5I the same bringeth forth
2 Corinthians 1:8-9For we would not, which came to us in Asia, above strength, insomuch But we had the sentence of not trust in ourselves,
Ephesians 5:20Giving name of our Lord Jesus
|
Comment
The Bible never teaches that problems
are opportunities. This notion is part of the transformation philosophy that
permeates the New Age movement, where ones attitude a mental disposition
determines ones success at turning problems into opportunities.
It is significant that the words
depend or dependence do not appear anywhere in the Bible (KJV). Neither does
the word intimacy. Our relationship with the LORD is not based on dependence
or intimacy which are psychological or emotional terms but on faith and
trust. Throughout her book Ms Young replaces a Biblical relationship with God by
an emotional, psychological one, where feeling and presence become the
yardsticks that determine how close we are to God.
As she states in her Introduction, she
has craved all her life for an encounter with the Presence of Jesus. She
doesnt seem to understand that we will encounter Jesus only when we die or when
we are taken up in the Rapture. While we are here on this earth we are awaiting
his return, not seeking his Presence. He is with us through the Holy Spirit
dwelling in us, but the Bible never teaches that this carries with it a feeling
or sensation of any kind. The Word of God feeds our hearts and facilitates our
sanctification as we grow in Christ. But this is not enough for Ms Young. As she
states in her Introduction: I knew that God communicated with me through the
Bible, but I yearned for more. This, alas, is the source of all her confusion
and her disastrous foray into mysticism. The mystic, for all his experiences and
ecstasies, for all his moving encounters with the presence of god, is
actually in rebellion against God and His Holy Word. And so is Ms Young.
Conclusion:
This devotion is seriously misleading.
Remember that you are on a journey with Me… your constant Companion… feel the strong grip of My hand holding yours… Never lose sight of My Presence with you.
|
Pray without ceasing.
My soul, wait thou only
|
Comment
The journey concept is common
throughout the occult, Freemasonry, and the New Age movement. The outer journey
reflects the inner journey, in accordance with the occult principle as above,
so below. Man is supposedly progressing through a series of stages in his
spiritual unfoldment as he advances toward his divine goal.
No one in the Bible was on a spiritual
journey of self-discovery. All men are fallen. They are cut off from God by sin
and need a Redeemer. There are therefore only two kinds of people on earth
today, those who have accepted our Redeemer and those who have not. The Enemy
tries to sow confusion by talking about journeys, as though our works and our
life experiences somehow contributed to our spiritual unfoldment. This is
the great Satanic lie. Salvation cannot come through works of any kind, or
through experiences of any kind, or through a journey of any kind. Salvation is
found only in Christ. And once we are born again, we serve our Redeemer with
selflessness and joy.
|
|
What is meant by feel the strong grip
of My hand holding yours? Again, feeling is used as a gauge for
measuring ones relationship with Christ. But the Bible never asks us to measure
our relationship with Christ or to validate its existence in any way. In fact,
we are never asked to use our feelings to validate anything! The Bible talks
again and again about knowledge and understanding, not feelings. We believe the
Word of God because it is true, not because we feel it is true. Alas, Ms Young
is exhorting her readers to seek some kind of mystical contact with Christ,
whether through imagination or visualization. But this is dangerous! It is
nothing less than an invitation to the fallen angels to supply the supernatural
impulse that will feed our emotional need. When imagination or visualization are
used in this way, they open a door to the occult.
Once again, the Bible verses mentioned
by Ms Young have no application whatever to the bogus spirituality that she is
trying to teach.
Conclusion:
This devotion is seriously misleading and potentially dangerous.
|
This was the first time a Pope
non-Catholics.
|
|
Revelation 17:14 These shall make war with them: with
John 15:13-15 Greater love hath no man his Henceforth what that
|
Comment
The place where the mystic communes
with his god is often referred to as a sacred space. Sometimes a shaman will
cleanse his sacred space to rid it of demons. New Agers often set aside a
sacred space for meditation and cleanse it with incense.
Christians do not have a sacred
space where they commune with their intimate Friend. The Bible does not teach
this! Neither does it instruct us to relax into a peaceful Presence, but
Hinduism does, and Buddhism, and the occult literature of the Roman Catholic
mystics.
If one reads the reports of the Marian
visionaries of Medjugorje, where the so-called Virgin Mary has been appearing
for over 30 years, one finds the same tender emphasis on love, peace, and
presence, the same emotional manipulation, and the same haughty indifference to
all that the Bible has said in the matter.
The face behind the Marian apparitions
is Satan, who is adept at disguising himself as a benign angel of light. Our
earlier paper, Satan in Satin, examines what the Enemy is trying
to achieve through his Marian apparitions. He uses silly women, as Paul put
it, to spread his lies and lead people astray. Cloistered Catholic nuns crave
these kinds of experience mystical meetings with Jesus and Mary and
Satan will sometimes oblige, especially if his devious messages can be used to
corrupt sound doctrine.
Sadly,
as
more
women
crave
these
experiences, the net of deception is spread even
wider.
Conclusion:
This devotion is seriously misleading.
|
|
Relax in My healing, holy Presence. Allow Me to you through this time alone with Me…As you walk saturating your mind with Scripture, I will show spend your time and energy. My Word is a lamp My Presence is a Light for your path.
|
See then that ye walk Redeeming
Thy word is a lamp unto my
|
Comment
This is a shamelessly New Age
perversion of Biblical truth. The King James version of the Bible translates
Psalm 119:105 as Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path.
However, Ms Young does not quote the KJV translation but a Gnostic corruption:
My Word is a lamp to your feet; My Presence is a Light for your path.
There is a vast difference between
Thy word is…a light unto my path and My Presence is a Light for your path.
What devastation is wrought in the life of any Christian who falls into this
trap! Gods Word is Gods Word! It is not a Presence or a mystical
communication of any kind.
This poisonous devotion is
unspeakably dangerous. The reader is being tricked into connecting a mystical
presence with Gods Holy Word the Bible itself! and then relying on that
Presence and its mystical communication for his spiritual instruction and
guidance. Her invisible friend even states As you walk close to Me, saturating
your mind with Scripture…, thus confirming that the continual practice or
awareness of this Presence is equivalent to filling ones mind with Scripture.
This mystical foolishness will destroy
many lives in the years ahead and wreak havoc in the church. It is heresy and
false teaching of the worst kind!
Even if her readers do not fall
completely into this trap, they will likely come away with the impression that
the Bible, when it is read, should be studied under the guidance of
this so-called Presence. The truth of what God is saying will be shrouded in
mysticism and the objective meaning of His word What is God saying?
will be replaced by a subjective distortion, What is God saying to me?
This meditative, mind-emptying way of
studying the Bible is already widely practised in lectio divina, a Roman
Catholic method of Bible study that has won many adherents among evangelicals.
It is Gnostic and harmful. By departing from a study method based on reason and
replacing it with one based on feeling and intuition, the student is unable to
understand what God is actually saying. The meaning of the text changes
with each reading, and from person to person, in accordance with subjective
factors that have no bearing whatever on the truth and meaning of Gods Word.
Ms Youngs inner guide also refers in
this devotion to the power of the Presence to transform the individual. But
what does that mean? Does it mean sanctification? Hardly, since nothing of this
kind is ever mentioned. Instead, the reader is left to gravitate toward the
Gnostic view of spiritual transformation that permeates popular culture, which
has nothing whatever to do with Biblical justification or sanctification.
Conclusion:
This devotion is laced with the Serpents venom.
|
|
|
Isaiah 54:10 For the mountains shall kindness my
Genesis 28:15 And, behold, I am with whither will thee
Matthew 28:20 …lo, I am with you alway,
|
Comment
As stated earlier, Jesus is with each
born-again believer through the indwelling of the Holy Spirit. Toward the close
of his ministry, he told his disciples that he was going to his Father but that
he would send another Comforter. This is the Holy Spirit who enables us to pray
to our Father in the name of his wonderful Son. Christ restored to us the
relationship with our Father that mankind lost at the Fall. The Father is
all-knowing but He is not in the world or part of the world. He is not
a mystical Presence!
To practice the presence of God, as
Brother Lawrence taught, and as so many professing Christians teach today, is a
very serious spiritual error. Our Father is not present with us in the same
way that an angel may be present. In fact our Father does not operate in the
world in any way that our minds can understand or that any faculty of our being
can apprehend.
So who benefits from a teaching based
on a supernatural Presence? Lucifer, of course! He is both part of Creation
and present in Creation. Therefore Christians who seek out and respond to a
presence and strive to communicate with it are being incredibly foolish.
We do not need to strive to find God
since the Holy Spirit is already dwelling within each and every born-again
believer. Jesus confirmed that the Holy Spirit will lead us into all truth:
Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he
will guide you into all
truth (John
16:13).
Note
the
words all truth
we dont
need
angelic
instruction
of
any kind.
Ms Young seems to believe that if this
Presence is comforting or reassuring in some way then it must be from God. But
this is absurd! Satan is quite capable of projecting a soothing persona, as his
numerous Marian apparitions attest. The Bible gives one and only one test that
must be performed whenever a supernatural presence attempts to
communicate with us. This may be found in 1 John 4 (which we have already
discussed).
Conclusion:
This devotion is seriously misleading.
|
|
|
Psalm 37:3-6 Trust in the LORD, and do and verily thou shalt be he shall give thee the the LORD; trust also in shall bring forth thy as the noonday.
Philippians 4:19 But my God shall supply glory
|
Comment
The
Scripture cited does not support the thoughts expressed in this devotion.
Ms Youngs
invisible friend has a Love-Light that never dims. This is very similar to the
astral intimacy and emotional intensity that are expressed in Sufi poetry by
mystics like Rumi and Hafiz, but it is certainly not Biblical. The light that
fills the mind and heart of Rumi is that of his guru, Sham-i-Tabriz. That light
had a powerful effect on Rumi, a lifelong Muslim, but it was not the
light of Christ.
Satan is
known as Lucifer, the Light Bearer, because he has a false light, a truly
brilliant radiance that can overpower the human senses: Thine heart was lifted
up because of thy beauty, thou hast corrupted thy wisdom by reason of thy
brightness (Ezekiel 28:17). Mystics down the centuries have yearned for this
light and been intoxicated by it. The Catholic nuns mentioned in this paper were
addicted to this false light, to the intense emotions that it evoked, and to the
presence from which it emanated.
There is
no difference between the light of the Roman Catholic mystics, the light of the
Sufi mystics, the light of the Hindu and Buddhist mystics, and the light
described by Ms Young. It is perceived as a love-light by our fallen human
nature, but it is a false light, the light of the Enemy.
As Christ
warned, If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that
darkness! (Matthew 6:23)
Conclusion: This devotion is spiritual poison.
|
|
|
|
Psalm 89:15-16 Blessed is the people that O rejoice
1 John 3:19-20 And hereby we know that we before him. For if our and knoweth all things.
Jude 24-25 Now unto him that is able you To and
Psalm 41:12 And as for me, thou before
|