 |
The Dark Roots of EUGENICS By Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D.
See original article on |
|
Men of wealth like
Andrew Carnegie and the Rockefellers
played an important part in funding the eugenics movement. In 1904, the
Carnegie Institution, with
Skull & Bones member Daniel Coit Gilman as
president, financed the establishment of a biological experiment station
related to eugenics at Cold Spring Harbor, New York. In 1910, the Eugenics
Record Office was begun there and later received funding from the
Rockefeller Foundation after John D.
Rockefeller, Jr. formed the Bureau of Social Hygiene.It was during this time of the
early 20th Century that
Rockefeller introduced
Margaret Sanger to the monied
elite who would help her form the
Birth Control League which would later
become
Planned Parenthood. The November 1921 issue of Sangers
Birth Control Review carried the heading Birth Control: To Create A
Race of Thoroughbreds, and Sanger would later advocate eugenically limiting
dysgenic stocks such as blacks, Hispanics, American Indians and Catholics,
as well as slum dwellers such as Jewish immigrants.In 1926, Rockefeller money
funded the founding of the American Eugenics Society, and the next
year on May 2, 1927, the U.S. Supreme Court by an 8 to 1 majority ruled in
Buck v. Bell that certain unfit people could be forcibly
sterilized. Regarding this ruling, British [Fabian Socialist] Professor Harold Laski wrote his
friend Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes: Sterilize all
the unfit, among whom I include all fundamentalists.In the April 1933 edition of
Margaret Sangers Birth
Control Review,
Dr.
Ernst Rudin of Hitlers Nazi Third Reich wrote Eugenic Sterilization:
An Urgent Need.After WWII and the Nazis
supposed defeat, you would think the world would find the Nazi philosophy
abhorrent. However, when Fabian Socialist Sir
Julian Huxley
became the first Director-General of UNESCO, he authored
UNESCO: ITS PURPOSE
AND ITS PHILOSOPHY (1948) in which he revealed thateven though it
is quite true that any radical eugenic policy will be for many years
politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO
to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that
the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that is now
unthinkable may at least become thinkable.
Ginsburg: I thought
Roe was to rid undesirables:
“In an astonishing admission, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader
Ginsburg says she was under the impression that legalizing abortion
with the 1973 Roe. v. Wade case would eliminate undesirable members
of the populace, or as she put it ‘populations that we don’t
want to have too many of.‘”
John Holdren, Obama’s
Science Czar, says: Forced abortions and mass sterilization needed
to save the planet:
“[In a
1977 book he co-authored, he wrote:] ‘Indeed, it has been concluded
that compulsory population-control laws… could be sustained under
the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently
severe.’ … ‘Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple
foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than
most proposals for involuntary fertility control…. To be acceptable,
such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements….”
The ghoulish spirit of Margaret Sanger lives:
“Women could be forced to abort their pregnancies, whether they wanted to or not;
The population at large could be sterilized by infertility drugs intentionally put into the nations drinking water or in food…
People who’ contribute to social deterioration‘ (i.e. undesirables)
‘can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility’ in other words, be compelled to have abortions or be sterilized.
A transnational ‘Planetary Regime’ should … dictate the most intimate details of Americans lives using an armed international police force.”
Ginsburg: I thought
Roe was to rid undesirables:
“In an astonishing admission, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader
Ginsburg says she was under the impression that legalizing abortion
with the 1973 Roe. v. Wade case would eliminate undesirable members
of the populace, or as she put it ‘populations that we don’t
want to have too many of.‘”
Obama’s Biggest Radical:
“When Barack Obama nominated John P. Holdren as his Science Adviser last December 20, the president-elect stated
‘promoting science isnt just about providing resources’ but ‘ensuring that facts and evidence are never twisted or obscured by politics or ideology.’ In nominating John Holdren,
his words could scarcely have taken a more Orwellian ring. … Holdren is a
globalist who has endorsed ‘surrender of sovereignty’ to ‘a comprehensive
Planetary Regime”‘ that would …
enforce world population limits. He has… and left the door open to trying
global warming
‘deniers’ for crimes against humanity. Such is Barack Obama’s idea of a clear-headed adviser on matters of scientific policy.”