![]() |
|
Let the word of
Christ dwell in you richly in all wisdom;
teaching and admonishing one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs,
singing with grace in your hearts to the Lord.
(Colossians 3:16, KJV)
Admittedly,
the issue to be addressed is as touchy as it is feely. Music is feely
because people feel it. In his book
Music, The Brain, and Ecstasy,
Robert Jourdain wrote of the ecstasy music generates. He states:“Ecstasy melts the
boundaries of our being . . . engulfs us in feelings that
are ‘oceanic.’“A defining trait of ecstasy is its immediacy . . . Ecstasy happens to
our selves. It is a momentary transformation of the knower . . .“Music seems to be the most immediate of all the arts, and so the
most ecstatic . . . Nonetheless, once we are engulfed in music,
we must exert effort to resist its influence. It really is as if some
‘other’ has entered not just our bodies, but our intentions, taking
us over.“[1]
Music is touchy because all of us have
preferences. Some styles of music we like. Others, we dislike. So we
associate with people who possess similar tastes. Over the last decades
worship wars have erupted in local churches over the touchy tastes of
music, whether they are traditional or contemporary. Congregations divide,
even split over tastes. Seemingly, some Christians would rather fight than
switch. So to avoid the strife, its common for local churches to offer both
a contemporary and traditional service, the difference being the style of
music that is offered. As one artist states that, This force . . . is
powerful stuff.[2]
Romancing the Soul
In a recent internet article on music titled
Secular or Sacred? John Johnson
states that, when it comes to music, its all spiritual.[3] Then to
buttress his statement, he observes,“Music falls into one of those mysterious in-between placesthe kind the
ancients believed was prone to magic. Like the mythological space
between night and day, darkness and light, or the present and the
future, music inhabits a place somewhere between our mind, emotions, and
souland it colors all of them.”[4]
While not using the word
mystical, Johnson does describe music as mysterious, magical, and
mythical. Yet in stating that musics power is beyond language and laws,
he implies it to be mystical.[5]
Mysterious, Magical, Mythical, and Mystical
Psychologist William James (1842-1910) pointed out that music is beyond
language. Though mystics often employ self-contradicting phraseslike
shoreless lake, mute language, whispering silence, and dazzling
obscurityto explain their unexplainable experiences, James noted that
unlike conceptual speech, music is exempt from such contradictory phrases.
Why is this so? Because, he believed music is the element through which we
are best spoken to by mystic truth. Then he added, Many mystical
scriptures are indeed little more than musical compositions.[6]Music communicates, but its language is neither conceptual nor verbal, but
experiential. As one bumper sticker put it, When words fail, music speaks.
As a child, Johnson related, Before I could articulate my thoughts through
speech, I could express my heart through song.[7] So he wisely concludes,
Musics power comes from its inherently spiritual nature, and when you find
a tool that powerful, you should be careful how you use it.[8] So how in
Christian worship should this powerful tool be employed? Does the Bible have
anything to say about musics role in church worship?In the Old Testament, as evidenced in the book of Psalms, music plays a
prominent role in the life and worship of Israel. In the New Testament
believers are enjoined to teach and admonish one another in
in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs,
singing with grace in your hearts to the Lord (Colossians 3:16). In
Pauls letters, some observations about music are necessary.
Tests for Tunes
First, music is about
singing and making melody with your heart
to the Lord (Emphasis Mine,
Ephesians 5:19b). Again, we are to sing
with thankfulness in [our] hearts
to God (Emphasis Mine,
Colossians 3:16b). Music is not for our entertainment. But Rick Muchow
confessed of Saddlebacks services,At Saddleback our decibel level ranges
from 98 to 108 decibels (every three decibels doubles the volume level).
Saddleback seekers dont just want to hear the musicthey want to feel the
music.[9]This statement reveals the purpose of the music. They want to
feel it. The decibel level is about the musics sensory impact upon the
listeners, an intent that is obviously man, not God-centered. Its about
them, not Him. But worship music shouldnt be for our pleasure, but for
Gods glory, and for this purpose any ole music will not do, for as the
prophet told Israel,Take thou away from
me the noise of thy songs; for I will not hear the melody of thy viols
(Amos 5:23).So what kind of music pleases Him?
This brings us to a
second observation. Since God is a spirit,
spiritual songs are those which
please Him. Worship should be conducted using
psalms and hymns and
spiritual songs (Emphasis
Mine, Ephesians 5:19; Colossians 3:16). We note Pauls use of the adjective
spiritual. That he uses the qualifier indicates that all songs are not
spiritual. So what makes songs spiritual?
Spiritual Songs
Vine states that, spiritual songs are songs of which the burden is the
things revealed by the Spirit.[10]
At the beginning of his thoughtful and stimulating writing on music, Johnson
states, We should stop trying to define a dividing line, because when it
comes to music, its all spiritual.[11]
In deference to Johnson, and as evident from
Pauls use of the qualifier spiritual, we are forced to conclude that not
all songs are spiritual. They may be mysterious, magical, mythical, and even
mystical, but that does not qualify them as spiritual. Spiritual songs are
those which first glorify Christ and then promote unity in the local Body of
Christ.
Christ Songs
Third, spiritual songs are about Christ. Of the
Spirit, Jesus said,
When the Helper comes,
whom I will send to you from the Father, that is the Spirit of truth, who
proceeds from the Father, He will bear witness of Me . . . (John
15:26).Music that is truly of the Spirit will be Christocentric. If songs
do not draw attention to the Lord Jesus Christ, but primarily to the sound
or feel of them, or perhaps to the performing artist, then it must be
questioned whether they are spiritual. Authentic spiritual songs are to be
about Him, and not for us. Yet about much contemporary music Professor
Michael Hamilton notes, One cannot sing praise songs without noticing how
first person pronouns tend to eclipse every other subject.[12] But in the
praise songs of heaven, the first person will not be the pronoun of choice
(See Revelation 4:8, 11; 5:9; 15:3-4.).
Fourth, spiritual songs are sourced in
the word of Christ that abundantly
indwells Gods children. Spiritual songs spring forth from the heart as they
testify and extol the person and work of Jesus. He is to be the object of
our praise.[13]
Like the twenty-four elders, authentic worship extols in song the worth of
the Lamb (Revelation 5:9). If worship music is not Christ centered, then
however else one might classify it, the songs are not spiritual (i.e., of
the Spirit), for the Spirits ministry is, like the Scriptures which He
inspired, to bear witness to Christ (John 5:39; 2 Peter 1:21). Of the hymns
quoted in the New Testament, one scholar noted that, these hymns have a
common pattern of thought . . . They are related to the person and mission
of Christ Jesus.[14]Good worship music, lyrics, and singing proclaim truth about God and His
Christ. Jesus Person and Work are to be both the subject and object of the
churchs praise. In addition to the Old Testament Psalms, the New Testament
contains, alludes to, and quotes from several apostolic era hymns.[15]
For example, it is thought by scholars that the Kenosis passage of
Philippians 2:5-11 was excerpted from an ancient hymn. Pauls poetic lines
in 1 Timothy chapter three, and verse sixteen, are thought to have been part
of an ancient hymn.[16] Other Scripture passages quoted in the New Testament
evidence that they were probably ancient Christian hymns (John 1:1-14;
Ephesians 5:14; Colossians 1:15-20; Hebrews 1:3; 1 Peter 1:18-24; 2:21-25;
3:18-22; Revelation 5:9 ff., 12; 12:10-12; 19:1ff.).[18] These hymns exhibit
profound Christological content that the Holy Spirit, whose ministry is to
bear witness to Christ, led the apostles to quote and include in the New
Testament (See John 14:26; 15:26-27.). Spiritual songs are
teaching songs! (Colossians 3:16,
Greek, didaskō)If word of [about]
Christ dwells in us, then such
indwelling will be manifested by our singing songs that will, as the Spirit
bears witness, extol the worth and work of Jesus Christ. On this basis
alone, much of contemporary music may not be categorized as spiritual, as
prompted by the Holy Spirit. Johnson admits to this when he speaks of the
mind-numbing drivel sung by well-known Christian artists.[19]
He confessed that, After more than twenty years in the Christian music
world, I have seen more than my fair share of sub-standard, untruthful,
disingenuous, and manipulative propaganda peddled under the label
Christian.[20]
This brings us to a
fifth test.
Unity of the Spirit
Corollary to the witness that church music ought to bear to Jesus Christ,
spiritual songs should also, in concert with the Spirits work, facilitate
the development of congregational unity. Paul wrote to the Ephesians that,
There is one body, and one Spirit . . .
Therefore, that church was to endeavor to keep the unity of the Spirit in
the bond of peace (Ephesians 4:4, 3). Note the
unity of the Spirit. Jesus prayed
that all true believers would be one (John 17:20-23). Spiritual songs
contribute to the unity of the local body as its members, employ them to
teach and admonish one another in the faith.
One Another
Therefore, the Apostle Paul wrote that Spirit-filled believers were to speak
to one another in psalms and hymns and
spiritual songs (Ephesians 5:19). In another letter he wrote that
the Colossians were to teach and admonish
one another with psalms and hymns
and spiritual songs
(Colossians 5:16).[21]
We cannot help but note the one-anothering
facilitated in the singing of psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs. Divisive
music violates the intent of it; that is to glorify God and promote unity in
the church. Music that does not promote one-anothering is not spiritual.
Selfish songs which promote discord in the congregation are not spiritual.In the biblical understanding, regardless of whatever else can be said about
them, songs that do not testify of Jesus Christ and promote unity amongst
believers are not spiritual per se. As the Apostle Paul wrote,
I will pray with the spirit, and I will
pray with the understanding also: I will sing with the spirit, and I will
sing with the understanding (Greek,
nous, or mind) also (1
Corinthians 14:15). Godly singing is not to be something mysterious,
magical, mythical, even mystical, but is mental. Assuming a distinction
between the right brain (feely) and the left brain (thinky)personally, I
believe the two brain theory is hocus pocusthen good worship music that
contains lyrics that are thoroughly about the person and work of Christ,
will provide an exhilarating corporate worship experience that is all about
Him, and not about us.
Conclusion
Admittedly, for all of us the subject of music is a
touchy-touchy-feely-feely one. The controversy over church music is not
new, and has in another time and place involved the appropriateness of using
organs and pianos in worship. Personally, I have attended church services
where they only sang a cappella from the Hebrew Psalter. But Paul
instructed, we are to Let the word of
Christ dwell in you richly in all wisdom; teaching and admonishing one
another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing with grace in your
hearts to the Lord (Colossians 3:16). In addition to the singing of
psalms, hymns and spiritual songs are appropriate for corporate worship.But absent the word of Christ in it, music without a message is not worship.
Such music will neither teach nor admonish others in the faith. It may be
entertainment. It may provide emotional catharsis, but in so doing the songs
become me-centered and in such a centering, are therefore carnal, and not
spiritual. Confessing the dividedness residing in his heart over music,
Augustine offered his personal testimony that might help all of us discern
which music is consistent with the indwelling word of Christ:“However, when I call to mind the tears I shed at the songs of thy
Church at the outset of my recovered faith, and how even now I am moved,
not by the singing but by what is sung . . . I then come to acknowledge
the great utility of this custom. . . . Yet when it happens that I am
more moved by the singing than by what is sung, I confess myself to have
sinned wickedly, and then I would rather not have heard the singing.”[22]
Worship songs that teach and admonish
must do so with lyrics containing the word of Christ which glorifies the
Lord and promotes one-anothering in the local body of Christ. Absent their
conveyance logos truth, reasonably discerned as revealed in the Holy
Scriptures, the only basis of appeal of the music is in the mystical realm.
ENDNOTES
1. Robert Jourdain, Music, The Brain, and
Ecstasy (New York: Avon Books, 1997) 327-328.
2. John J. Johnson, Secular or Sacred?
ChristianityToday.com, May 5, 2009 (http://www.christianitytoday.com:80/music/commentaries/2009/secularorsacred.html).
I found Johnsons article stimulating to my thinking about church music. I
want to thank Renee Dixon for drawing my attention to it.
3. See my article “Everything Is Not Spiritual,” posted on
http://www.sliceoflaodicea.com/uncategorized/everything-is-not-spiritual.
Emergent Rob Bell states that, In the Hebrew language there is no word for
spiritual. If you would have said to Jesus, Hows your spiritual life?
he would have said, What? What do you mean? because to label one area
spiritual is to label areas not spiritual. Its absolutely foreign to
the world of the Scriptures. Its absolutely foreign to the worldview of
Jesus. The assumption is that you are a fusion of the two realms. . . .
Everything we do we do as an integrated being. One-hundred percent physical,
one-hundred percent spiritual. To proof text his everything-is-spiritual
paradigm, Bell then quotes Colossians 3:17 where Paul states, And whatever
you do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus . . . (See
Rob Bell: Everything is Spiritual, YouTube,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Poi3imQkQsQ).
Of course, Bells sweeping generalization is not true. Everything is not
spiritual for natural persons because the
things of the Spirit of God . . . are foolishness unto him (1
Corinthians 2:14, KJV). Then too, Paul states that
the carnal mind is enmity against God
(Romans 8:7). Pan-everything-is-spiritual is not the
Scriptural/spiritual worldview.
4. Johnson, Secular.
5. Ibid.
6. William James, The Varieties of
Religious Experience (New York: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1902)
420-421.
7. Johnson, Secular.
8. Ibid.
9. Rick Muchow, Pastors.com, Seeker-sensitive worship does not mean
shallow. See
www. pastors.com/article.asp?ArtID=3829
10. W.E. Vine, Merrill F. Unger and William White, Spiritual,
An Expository Dictionary of Biblical Words
(Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 1984) 1078.
11. Johnson, Secular
12 Michael S. Hamilton, The Triumph of the Praise Songs,
Christianity Today, July 12, 1999,
34.
13. Though the genitive of Christ may be subjective indicating that Christ
is the speaker when His word is proclaimed or sung, the better option
understands the genitive to be objective; that is, the message contained in
psalms, hymns and spiritual songs
ought to be centered on Christ. See Peter T. OBrien,
Colossians, Philemon (Waco: Word
Books, Publisher, 1982) 206.
From the early centuries, the Magnificat
(Luke 1:46-55), Benedictus (Luke
1:68-79), and Nuc Dimittis (Luke
2:29-32) have been used by the church in praise worship. These words uttered
by Mary the mother of Jesus, Zacharias the father of John the Baptist, and
Simeon evidence godly Christ-centricity as they exalt the Lord.
14. See Ralph P. Martin, Worship In the
Early Church (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1964) 52.
15. Ibid. 39-52.
16. See Ralph P. Martin, A Hymn of Christ
(Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 1997).
17. Mounce calls verse 16 the fragment of a Christological hymn. William
D. Mounce, Pastoral Epistles
(Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 2000) 215.
18. Martin, Worship, 50-51.
19. Johnson, Secular.
20. Ibid.
21. Regarding Pauls threefold classification, Bruce comments: It is
unlikely that any sharply demarcated division is intended, although psalms
might be drawn from the OT Psalter (which has supplied a chief vehicle for
Christian praise from primitive times), the hymns might be Christian
canticles (some of which are reproduced, in whole or in part, in the NT
text), and spiritual songs might be unpremeditated words sung in the
Spirit . . . See F.F. Bruce, The Epistles
to the Colossians, to Philemon, and to the Ephesians (Grand Rapids:
William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1984) 158-159.
If spontaneous, spiritual songs will vindicate their origin as truly being
of the Spirit for reason that they will exalt Christs Person and Work. All
singing is to be conducted with a thankful, not a selfish heart. Hymns are
to be about Him, not about us!
22. Augustine, Confessions, The Library
of Christian Classics, Volume VII, Albert C. Outler, Translator and
Editor (Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1955) Book 10, Chapter XXXIII,
50.
© 2009 Larry DeBruyn
Source:
http://herescope.blogspot.com/2009/05/spiritual-songs.html* *
*
Index to other articles by Discernment Group
Home
|
Articles |
Reinventing the
World
|