“Mere Anglicanism”

Legitimized syncretism
under the guise of Christian unity!
This phrase describes
what is happening today among evangelicals, and it is a key to understanding
the destruction that C. S. Lewis has brought to Biblical Christianity.

 

The Gospel is the ONE
Gospel—it’s not one of many. Under the guise of Christian unity, Lewis has
brought in syncretism—many gospels.

 

For instance, he
believed in purgatory (a
Roman Catholic invention), which necessarily follows from another gospel—a
form of Pelagianism. This view holds that one must be purified to
come into the presence of the living God, but purgatory is not by the
righteousness of Christ. That is another gospel, but Lewis doesn’t have any
problem holding and promoting that view. That’s one reason why people who
follow Lewis can blithely become Roman Catholics (e.g.
Peter Kreeft, Sheldon Vanauken, Thomas Howard,
Joseph Pearce) and can become syncretists with Eastern religions
(e.g. Dom Griffiths).

 

Lewis also preaches that
God speaks through myths and that pagan myths are actually precursors to the
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ. He believes in universal revelation. And he
extols George MacDonald, whom he called his “master,” who believed that
eventually all will be saved—even Satan.

 

The gospel that C. S.
Lewis preached was not the same Gospel that Paul preached. This is why I
consider C. S. Lewis so dangerous for Biblical Christianity.

---

 

Comment for Jodi:
“How can very
reliable, strong in their faith, wise and knowledgeable people in the
Lord praise him so much and not seem to see the horrible danger of his
writings? As you may remember, his book and what I said about it divided
me from a sister in Christ and our homeschool class. 

     
“I have even seen Christians whom I
respect very much praise
The Abolition of
Man, and only talk how it speaks of the errors of the education
system and not even mention Lewis’s praise of the Tao in that
book, as if it didn’t exist!

        “I
just don’t get it. People who should be sounding an alarm about him are
praising his works with little or no question of the things he said. Can
you help me get a handle on this?

 

Response from
Berit: It puzzles me, too, Jodi. Christian leader — who
expose all kinds of errors and mystical additions to Christianity —
refuse to recognize the mystical wolrdviews and pagan forces that
permeated many of Lewis’ books. It IS strange!

       But it
does tell us something about human nature — and how (1) susceptible we
are to believe popular leaders, (2) blindly we follow authors who sound
“wise” and make difficult issues simple and pleasing, and (3) reluctant
we are to take stands that are contrary to popular opinion.
 

---

Index to articles by Richard and Linda Nathan

Green Like Envy: An Ex-pagan Looks at Blue Like Jazz

 See also


Warnings – How mysticism
& the occult are changing the Church

---

 

©
2008 by Richard Nathan

 

Richard Nathan holds a Master of Arts in Religion in Church History and has
been a Bible and church history teacher for over twenty years. He wrote his
thesis on the debate over the inerrancy of Scripture in a historical
analysis. See Richard’s blog at
www.gloriousriches.blogspot.com for ongoing discussion about such trends
in Christianity as Romantic Christianity and the Emergent Church movement.

Visit
www.fictionplumbline.com for articles evaluating Christian fiction from
a biblical perspective.

---

If you would like to comment on this
short messsage, you can write us here:











Email us

Home