|
See: The UN Plan for Global Migration (Part1)
by Berit Kjos – June 25, 2006 |
|
“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis…and the nations will accept the New World Order..”[1] David Rockefeller
“I see a world of open borders, open trade and, most importantly, open minds; a world that celebrates the common heritage that belongs to all the world’s people…. I see a world building on the emerging new model of European unity. . [T]he United Nations is the place to build international support and consensus for meeting the other challenges we face…. the threats to the environment, terrorism… international drug trafficking… refugees…. [W]e must join together in a new compact — all of us — to bring the United Nations into the 21st century.”[2] Former President George H. W. Bush
“You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. ‘This crisis provides the opportunity for us to do things that you could not do before.” President Obama’s Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel
“Globalization is not a random-walk process. It moves forward according to a tangible, coherent and well-planned strategy.” Patrick Wood, The Globalization Strategy
Why won’t our leaders enforce a simple, straight-forward immigration policy?
Why doesn’t our government pull out of the United Nations? Why not abandon the
planned US merger with Mexico and Canada? Why not…? In light of our
American heritage, the questions all make sense!But logical answers often ignore the grandiose dreams of the
elite
revolutionaries who drive the UN agenda. To them, it makes more sense to open
our borders, invite illegal immigration, and risk rising lawlessness and terrorism.
In fact, each such crisis becomes a potential instrument for change — a stepping
stone toward Lord Tennyson’s envisioned “Federation
of the world.”Former President George H. W. Bush echoed that goal. “Out
of these troubled times… a
NEW WORLD ORDER
can emerge,“[4]
he told Congress in a 1990 message aptly titled “Toward a New World Order.”
Back then, the opportune crisis was the Gulf War. It helped build public
acceptance for the global management system, which had already begun to replace
American “rights”
with global rules.
The pace of change has quickened since
then. As you saw in Part 1, our current president
(like his two predecessors) has willingly surrendered Americans to a spreading
web of UN declarations, treaties and policies that undermine our constitution.
And America’s “human resources” are now molded, measured and monitored according
to global standards for
educational outcomes,
“mental health,” “service
learning,” and training for a
global workforce.[5]Legal or not, migration is vital to this transformational
process! Let’s look at some of its goals:
1. Replace national
boundaries with open borders in a unified
worldAncient monarchs understood the transformational
power of mass migration. When the mighty Assyrians conquered Israel back in
722 BC, they resettled the land with people who had never heard the truths of
God. Soon the blend of new settlers and local residents shifted the people’s
collective loyalties to new gods and rulers.This strategy still works! It helps explain why
globalist politician John Foster Dulles (Secretary of State in the Eisenhower
administration) called for freedom to migrate anywhere in the world. As chairman
of a national conference held by the liberal Federal Council of Churches (precursor
to the World Council of Churches) in 1942, he introduced these goals:
a world government of delegated powers
immediate limitations on national sovereignty
international control of all armies and navies
a universal system of money
[Revelation 13:17]
worldwide freedom of immigration
even distribution of the world’s natural wealth.”[6]
Even Time magazine
seemed shocked by this blatant one-world socialism: “Some of the conference’s
economic opinions were almost as sensational as the extreme internationalism
of its political program. It held that a ‘new order of economic life
is both imminent and imperative…. [T]he church must demand economic arrangements
measured by human welfare.’”[7]
Alger Hiss, the most infamous
leader within the Federal Council of Churches, was an active Communist and the
publisher of the socialist magazine International
Conciliation. That didn’t keep him from serving President
Roosevelt in the State Department. Nor did it hinder his assignments as the
Secretary General of the United Nations
organizing conference
(San
Francisco,
1945) — or as president of the multimillion
dollar Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
2. Replace individual thinking with
collective thinking
(i.e. propaganda, not unwanted facts)Western individualism has been thoroughly mocked
and maligned by today’s leading change agents. No wonder, since free, factual
thinking would slow their revolution. They can’t win their war unless they modify
our minds. John Dewey, father of progressive education in America, described
this psycho-social battle in his book,
Democracy and Education.
“There is always a danger that increased
personal independence will decrease the social capacity of an individual….
It often makes an individual so insensitive in his relations to others as
to develop an illusion of being really able to stand and act alone —
an unnamed form of insanity which is responsible for a large part of
the remedial suffering of the world.”[8]Equating independent thinking with insanity, Dewey’s
fighting words illustrate the heartless tactics
of his totalitarian contemporaries. Stalin, Hitler and Mao didn’t hesitate to
remediate or incarcerate
resisters
as mentally ill.
And with the rise of the UN, these views were legitimized
among the
ruling elite. For example, Canadian
psychiatrist Brock Chisholm became the first head of the World Health Organization
(WHO). Notice how he presented “mental health”
as a useful crisis in the following message, which would later be published
by Alger Hiss:“To
achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of
men their individualism, loyalty to family tradition, national
patriotism, and religious dogmas.”
“For many generations we have bowed our necks to the yoke of the conviction
of sin. We have swallowed all manner of poisonous certainties fed
us by our parents….
“There is something to be said… for gently putting aside the mistaken
old ways of our elders if that is possible. If it cannot be done gently,
it may have to be done roughly or even violently.”[9]Half
a century later, the same ideology was cloaked in less threatening language.
In 1995, UNESCO issued a report titled, Our Creative Diversity. I read
this book on my flight back from the 1996
UN Conference on Human Settlements
in Istanbul. It stated:“The challenge to humanity is to adopt
new ways of thinking, new ways of acting, new ways of organizing
itself in society, in short, new ways of living.”[10]This message is staggering. Everything must be changed! Students must learn
to embrace the “systems“
view of reality. The entire human race must be considered our family! And the
key to success would be countless small groups
around the world — all following
occultist
Georg Hegel‘s dialectic process.Migration — especially from non-Western nations would be encouraged, for
the dialectic process required social and spiritual diversity. Led by trained
facilitators toward a pre-planned consensus, the group members must agree to
seek “common ground” — an evolving “unity in diversity”. They must share their
feelings, listen respectfully, respect all contrary views, and bend their own
views to group opinion. Offensive facts and the Bible’s “poisonous certainties”
would be banned, for these hinder group manipulation.
[See Three kinds of group relationships]Notice that diversity itself is not the problem. Andy and I tramped
around the world in our younger days — paddling up the Nile on the mail boat,
trucking through parts of Africa, sleeping on 4th class trains rumbling through
India at night. Sometimes we were invited into homes — Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist
or Christian. We shared our beliefs, and they shared theirs, but no one tried
to merge the two.That’s not UNESCO’s style. Its
ways are best described by Peter Senge, an
MIT guru to corporate managers and church leaders around the world. In his celebrated
book, The Fifth Discipline, Dr. Senge writes,
“…it should come as no surprise that the
unhealthiness of our world today is in direct proportion to our inability
to see it as a whole.” With that revealing introduction, he goes on to define
“systems thinking.” Notice the reference to the psycho-social strategies needed
for change:
“Systems thinking is a discipline for
seeing wholes. It is a framework for seeing interrelationship
rather than things.’… It is also a set of specific tools and techniques….
[T]hese tools have been applied to understand a wide range of corporate,
urban, regional, economic, political, ecological and even psychological
systems.
[11]
Dr. Senge also co-authored the report,
“Communities
of Commitment: The Heart of Learning Organizations.“
It highlights the crisis of “fragmentation” that keeps people from trading “divisive”
Biblical views for a more systemic or holistic perspective.:“Fragmentation, competition, and reactiveness
are not problems to be solved — they are
frozen patterns
of thought to be dissolved. The solvent we propose is a new way of
thinking, feeling, and being…. In the new systems worldview,
we move from the primacy of pieces to the primacy of the whole, from
absolute truths to coherent interpretations, from self to community.”[12]
From absolute truth” to what? A global community that bans God’s Word?
3. Replace “divisive” Biblical absolutes
with “helpful” universal values
When applied to religion, the “new ways of thinking” means setting aside
our old “narrow” beliefs for the sake of unity. For this to happen, Christianity
must either bend or break, yet even church leaders are imposing these psycho-social
strategies on their unsuspecting followers. In fact, many Christians now believe
this new “systems thinking” fits
God’s purpose for humanity.
Echoing the message of UNESCO and Dr. Senge, “America’s pastor” Pastor Rick
Warren tells us,“It’s all about the global glory of God!
We intend to leverage the attention that the Purpose Driven Life
has garnered to bring about a whole new way of thinking and acting
in the church about our responsibility in the world.”[13]This “responsibility in the world” must focus on humanitarian
service, which we will discuss in Part 3.
But first, ponder Rick Warren’s tone and suggestion in the recent article, “What
to do when your church hits a plateau?” Apparently, he was asked how to
handle obstacles to change. In his answer, he points to the new way of thinking
and acting:“…some people are going to
have to die or leave. Moses had to wander around the desert for 40
years while God killed off a million people before he let them go
into the Promised Land. That may be brutally blunt, but it’s true. There
may be people in your church who love God sincerely, but who will never,
ever change….
[Does Pastor Warren believe
that he, as if like God, can simply dispose of people who question his clever
marketing strategies?]
“People ask, ‘Is it easier
to start new churches, or is it easier to take existing churches and turn
them around?’ My answer is this: ‘It’s always easier to have babies than
to raise the dead.’…
“…pray for an extra amount of patience. People change very slowly.
They are resistant to change because they recognize that life as they’ve
known it will cease to exist….
“…move with the movers…. Find out who the legitimizers are; the
ones who are willing to go for change…. Build your vision in them.”[14]
Did you notice that the purpose-driven
change agents are on the “good” side? People like us who question the
new marketing strategies are the ones who must “die or leave.” [See
Spirit-Led or Purpose-Driven:
Dealing with Resisters]
Keep in mind, this mind-changing system has no
tolerance for God’s divisive Truth.
Unless Christianity blends with other religions through diversity,
dialogue and deconstruction (compromising or tearing down old beliefs)
our globalist leaders will continue to face resistance. That’s why Federico
Mayor, former head of UNESCO used yet another crisis to fuel revolutionary fervor:
“The mission of UNESCO… is that of advancing…
international peace and the common welfare…. We have witnessed… the
resurgence of nationalism, the growth of fundamentalism and of religious
and ethnic intolerance.
The roots of exclusion and hatred have shown themselves even deeper and
more tenacious than we had feared….”[15]
As hostility toward Biblical Christianity grows in America, these words of
Jesus are becoming increasingly relevant:“If you were of
the world, the world would love its own. Yet because you are not
of the world, but I chose you out of the world, therefore the world hates
you…. If they persecuted Me they will persecute you… for they
do not know the One who sent Me.”
John 15:19-21“…the
time is coming that whoever kills you will think that he offers God service.
And these things they will do to you because they have not known the Father
nor Me.”
John 16:2-3
See
The Revolutionary Roots of the
UN | Re-Inventing the World
Steps toward Global Mind
Control | Real Conspiracies
Endnotes:
1.David Rockefeller speaking
at the UN, Sept. 14, 1994. 109.
2. George Bush,
Address Before
the 45th Session of the United Nations General Assembly, New York.
October 1st, 1990, at
www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=188833. Frosty Wooldridge, “A DEFINITIVE
IMMIGRATION POLICY” at
www.newswithviews.com/Wooldridge/frosty163.htm
4. President H. W. Bush
addressing Congress, September 11, 1990.
A Critique
and Chronology by Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D.
5.
www.crossroad.to/Books/BraveNewSchools/2-International.htm |
www.crossroad.to/text/articles/MentalHealth2-99.html
|
www.crossroad.to/Books/BraveNewSchools/6-Service.html
|
www.crossroad.to/text/articles/HumanResources.html
6. Edgar C. Bundy, Collectivism
in the Church (,1958), page 196-197, referring to the World Council of Churches’
1954 Biannual Report, page to page 165.
7. Time, March 16, 1942.
See
Conforming the Church
to the New Millennium at
www.crossroad.to/text/articles/ConformingChurch1-00.html
8. John Dewey,
Democracy and Education (The Macmillan Company, 1916), chapter 4. Referenced
by Dennis Laurence Cuddy, Ph.D., in Chronology of Education With Quotable Quotes.
9. G. Brock Chisholm,
“The Re-Establishment of Peacetime Society,” Psychiatry, February 1946. Later
published by Alger Hiss.<size=3></size=3>
10. UNESCO, Our Creative Diversity, UNESCO’s Commission
on Culture and [human] Development, 1995, page 11.
11. Peter M. Senge,
The Fifth Discipline (Doubleday, 1994), pages 68-69.
12. Kofman, Fred Senge,
Peter M., “Communities
of Commitment: The Heart of Learning Organizations” at
http://deming.eng.clemson.edu/pub/tqmbbs/prin-pract/comcom.txt
13. Rick Warren,
www.saddleback.com/home/todaystory.asp?id=6213.
See also Creating Community:
40 Days of Change through a New Way of Thinking
14. Rick Warren, “What
to do when your church hits a plateau” at
www.pastors.com/RWMT/default.asp?id=263&artid=4533&expand=1
15. Federico Mayor,
former Director-General of UNESCO, “Education and Human Development,” UNESCO,
1993. Quoting Edgar Faure, president, The International Commission on the Development
of Education, in its 1972 report, “Learning to be.” This information was available
at UNESCO’s Education and Human Development website seven years ago:
