Save the Earth by Killing 90% of Its People

by Berit Kjos - 1995

Gorbachev's Plan For A United World

 The State of the World According to Gorbachev, 1996

The U.N. Plan For Global Control: The Habitat II Agenda


Ponder the unthinkable threats behind these quotes:

1995: "Cut the population by 90 percent and there aren't enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage." Sam Keen, closing plenary session at Gorbachev's 1995 Global Conference, Nob Hill, San Francisco.

March 31, 2006: "Prof. Pianka 'enthusiastically advocated the elimination of 90 percent of Earth's population by airborne Ebola.'" (See "Meeting Doctor Doom," Forrest M. Mims III, The Citizen Scientist, March 31,2006

March 31,2006: Forrest Mims published a March 31 article in The Citizen Scientist. "I watched in amazement as a few hundred members of the Texas Academy of Science rose to their feet and gave a standing ovation to a speech that enthusiastically advocated the elimination of 90 percent of Earth's population by airborne Ebola." 

"The U.S. Centers for Disease Control owns a patent on a particular strain of Ebola known as 'EboBun.'...'" Why does the CDC own a patent on Ebola 'invention?'

 "The WHO even expects thousands of new cases of Ebola in Liberia over the next few weeks." Ebola Virologist: fight against Ebola outbreaks in Sierra Leone and Liberia is already lost

“As soon as a new Ebola treatment facility is opened, it immediately fills to overflowing with patients...” World Health Organisation says Ebola will claim 20,000 lives in next six months

"The United States has pledged to send 3,000 troops West Africa, using its military muscle to battle the biggest ever outbreak of the deadly Ebola virus, with an unprecedented mission to build treatment clinics and train health workers. ...The death toll from the deadly fever...has doubled in the past month to 2,461, mostly in three countries in West Africa." U.S. pledges 3,000 troops to fight Ebola; experts say more needed

What is going on! Where are the hearts and minds of our World Leaders?

TKM-Ebola, an anti-Ebola virus RNAi therapeutic, is being developed under a $140 million contract with the U.S. Department of Defense’s Medical Countermeasure Systems BioDefense Therapeutics (MCS-BDTX) Joint Product Management Office”.  

     As breaking and shocking of a news story as this has the potential to be, the real story is that this is not the most important part of the Ebola threat which has invaded the United States. The truth of the matter is that these unholy and untrustworthy associations, when it comes to “fighting” the Ebola virus, represent the mere tip of the iceberg.

    The more on digs into who is behind the creation and the development of vaccines for treating Ebola, the more the conspiracy networks widen. The most amazing fact is how incredibly easy it was to locate this information. I want to be clear on this point, Ebola was invented, a vaccine for Ebola has existed for 8-10 years, some government sponsored institutions as well as some of the global elite have positioned themselves to profit enormously from the spread of the virus and the development of and dissemination of mandatory Ebola vaccines and the imposition of total martial law in the process. Here is the proof....

Gates has announced that he plans to vaccinate every child in the third world with multiple vaccines, which could result in a dramatic population reduction of 10-15%. Do you realize the enormous profits that can be realized by vaccinating every child in the third world? If we apply Gates’ penchant for investing in causes which produce a hefty “return on investment” (ROI) then one could reasonably suspect that Gates is positioning himself to profit on the $50 million he has invested in the Ebola cause which conveniently includes the CDC, the holder of the patent for Ebola.

The NIH presently holds all patents on Ebola vaccines. Crucell is much like Tekimara is to Monsanto in that they are fronting the science for the Ebola vaccine treatment patents.

Today it is reported that the US State Department just ordered 160,000 Ebola Hazmat Suits. Lakeland Industries, the company that makes them says these Hazmat Suits are equipped to handle airborne Ebola. Needless to say, this news is creating concerns. This move is reminiscent of when the government bought 2 billion rounds of ammunition. The news of the possibility of Ebola being airborne is upsetting many. It is also causing a fear factor feeding frenzy among the CDC, WHO, and mainstream media.

Forbes announced a few days ago that Ebola had mutated. The new strain is acting in the direct manner of what one would consider an airborne virus. CNN is announcing the new behavior of the mutation makes it possible for a nightmare to happen. WHO is warning what will happen with Ebola if their plan is not followed. “The [estimate of 20,000] assumes full international backing for an intervention to control the deadly outbreak,” econometrics research assistant Francis Smart told “Failure to support the WHO’s plan presumably would cause the disease to spread in a similar manner as it already has,” Smart said. WHO is also saying it might take six months to contain the disease that has been found in over 20,000 cases in Africa.

This is all very interesting because back in August Tom Frieden, head of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention assured us that, "Ebola poses little risk to the U.S. general population." When asked if the virus can be transmitted through the air, the White House website stated that "No, Ebola is not a respiratory disease like the flu, so it is not transmitted through the air." However, new research from Canada showed that Ebola could be transmitted through the air....

Earlier this month, according to the CDC, two American aid workers treated at a Georgia hospital for three weeks after becoming infected with the deadly Ebola virus have recovered and now pose no health risk. Later the CDC stated, "there is no public health concern with the release of the patients and that they no longer have Ebola in their blood. Further, there are no restrictions to the patients' activities of daily living." This is amazing considering WHO chief Margaret Chan had previously stated the Ebola epidemic is out of control, there is no cure, no effective treatment, no vaccine, and Ebola kills up to 90 percent of its victims with astonishing swiftness.


On August 21 USA Today reported, “The USA will launch an early-stage trial in September of an experimental vaccine against Ebola..." It should be noted that once a public health emergency is declared by WHO, untested experimental vaccines can be given to populations. We are now into September. Remember, the CDC owns a patent on a particular strain of Ebola known as "EboBun." It's patent No. CA2741523A1 and it was awarded in 2010. In order to be patented, the virus has to be altered or modified from it's original chemical composition. So if the virus is mutating, guess who's mutating it?

Three days ago the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation announced that "it will commit $50 million to support the scale up of emergency efforts to contain the Ebola outbreak in West Africa and interrupt transmission of the virus." While this has the appearance of being enormously humanitarian, there is a problem. Bill and Melinda are huge financial backers of Monsanto, and Monsanto is reported to be one of the financial backers for the proposed Ebola vaccine, even though they vehemently deny it. The Gate's and Monsanto were also in bed with the polio vaccine in India. That partnership had a lethal impact on India.

Another player in the Ebola scenario is George Soros. George Soros’s foundation has funded personnel working in the Kenema bioweapons lab at the focus of the Ebola outbreak, and which is about to be closed, apparently amid an investigation. George Soros also has links to Sierra Leone President Ernest Koroma. As usual, the mainstream media is silent about the Kenema bioweapons lab closure.

We must not forget that Tulane University was ordered to stop Ebola testing and leave. Why? It is rumored that they were falsifying data. It is known that the Ebola strain from Central-Africa was used as the base, and was bioengeneered to become a new hybrid respiratory illness (a combination of Ebola Virus & Lassa Hemorrhagic Fever, weaponized via Tulane University & USAMRIID at Fort Detrick) making it become a genetic variant of the original strain. Brings us back to obtaining a patent on a virus.

Last but not least is President Obama's amendment to an executive order. Although Ebola was listed on the original executive order signed by Bush, Obama’s amendment ensures that Americans who merely show signs of respiratory illness, with the exception of influenza, can be forcibly detained by medical authorities. The amendment states, “Severe acute respiratory syndromes, which are diseases that are associated with fever and signs and symptoms of pneumonia or other respiratory illness, are capable of being transmitted from person to person, and that either are causing, or have the potential to cause, a pandemic, or, upon infection, are highly likely to cause mortality or serious morbidity if not properly controlled.”

With what we already know, and what they are currently telling us, we must ask how are they planning to use Ebola on Americans? No matter how much we are told things are being done for our protection, everyone involved has a track record for lying. What aren't they telling us? There are way too many people and companies involved, who do not have the best interests of the American people, for this to be good.


Unfortunately, during the March 3, 2006 lecture by Prof. Pianka, audio and video recording devices were ordered to be turned off."6 .


Health. Obama Signs Executive Order to Detain Americans With ‘Respiratory Illnesses: "President Barack Obama has signed an amendment to an executive order that would allow him to mandate the apprehension and detention of Americans who merely show signs of 'respiratory illness.' ...

      "...the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has measures in place for dealing with an outbreak of a communicable disease which allow for the quarantine of 'well persons' who 'do not show symptoms' of the disease.

     "...under the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act, public health authorities and governors would be given expanded police powers to seize control of communications devices, public and private property, as well as a host of other draconian measures in the event of a public health emergency. When the legislation was introduced, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons warned that it 'could turn governors into dictators.'”


Patent on Ebola!  Why does the CDC own a patent on Ebola 'invention?' "The U.S. Centers for Disease Control owns a patent on a particular strain of Ebola known as 'EboBun.'... The patent summary says, 'The invention provides the isolated human Ebola (hEbola) viruses denoted as Bundibugyo (EboBun) deposited with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention... on November 26, 2007.'"


Health. Ebola Virologist: fight against Ebola outbreaks in Sierra Leone and Liberia is already lost: "The killer virus is spreading like wildfire, Liberia’s defense minister said on Tuesday he pleaded for UN assistance. A German Ebola expert tells DW the virus must 'burn itself out' in that part of the world. His statement might alarm many people....

     "The situation is getting worse after 80 health workers, doctors and nurses, have died after contracting the disease. The WHO even expects thousands of new cases of Ebola in Liberia over the next few weeks."


Health. World Health Organisation says Ebola will claim 20,000 lives in next six months: “As soon as a new Ebola treatment facility is opened, it immediately fills to overflowing with patients, pointing to a large but previously invisible caseload,” WHO said in a statement. 'Many thousands of new cases are expected in Liberia over the coming three weeks.” A Doctors Without Borders statement was equally blunt, saying the virus was moving 'catastrophically through the population much faster than new facilities are being created.'”


Health. U.S. pledges 3,000 troops to fight Ebola; experts say more needed: "The United States has pledged to send 3,000 troops West Africa, using its military muscle to battle the biggest ever outbreak of the deadly Ebola virus, with an unprecedented mission to build treatment clinics and train health workers. ...The death toll from the deadly fever, which spreads rapidly, causes uncontrolled bleeding and fever and typically kills more than half of its victims, has doubled in the past month to 2,461, mostly in three countries in West Africa."


---------------------------------------------- .

Larry Elder: How Does Mexico Treat Its Illegals? | Main | FBI Interested in Dr."Doom's" Interest in Ebola »

Transcript: Dr. "Doom" Pianka Speaks -- First Transcript From the Speech That Started It All

Transcript From the Speech That Started It All 
Dr. "Doom" Pianka Speaks

By Rick Pearcey

Exclusive -- April 6, 2006: Relying on a transcript from audio recorded during Dr. Eric Pianka's presentation at the 109th meeting of the Texas Academy of Science March 2-4, The Pearcey Report has first-hand documentation on what the controversial ecologist said regarding a number of issues, including taxes, children, forced sterilization, overpopulation, economic growth, and more.  

News of Dr. Pianka's views broke when scientist and author Forrest Mims published a March 31 article in The Citizen Scientist.  In that article Mims said, "I watched in amazement as a few hundred members of the Texas Academy of Science rose to their feet and gave a standing ovation to a speech that enthusiastically advocated the elimination of 90 percent of Earth's population by airborne Ebola." 

On March 31, Dr. Pianka spoke to students and parents at St. Edwards University in Austin, Texas.  "A University of Texas professor says the Earth would be better off with 90 percent of the human population dead," is how the Gazette-Enterprise led its coverage of the talk.  [Editor's Note: The Pearcey Report noticed April 8, 2006, that the Gazette-Enterprise story no longer appears on the newspaper's website.  Update: As of April 10, the link is reestablished.]

"Every one of you who gets to survive has to bury nine," the professor is quoted as saying.  According to reporter Jamie Mobley, "Pianka's words are part of what he calls his 'doomsday talk' -- a 45-minute presentation outlining humanity's ecological misdeeds and Pianka's predictions about how nature, or perhaps humans themselves, will exterminate all but a fraction of civilization."

Mobley reports that, "though his statements are admittedly bold, he's not without abundant advocates.  But what may set this revered biologist apart from other doomsday soothsayers is this: Humanity's collapse is a notion he embraces."  

This is not new intellectual territory for the professor.  A Fall 2004 student evaluation from the University of Texas says, "Though I agree that convervation [sic] biology is of utmost importance to the world, I do not think that preaching that 90% of the human population should die of ebola is the most effective means of encouraging conservation awareness."

Another student comment from Fall 2004 says, "I don't root for ebola, but maybe a ban on having more than one child.  I agree . . . too many people ruining this planet."

That student may not be rooting for Ebola, but as Jamie Mobley reports, Dr. Pianka has supporters.  One of them attended Dr. Pianka's Texas Academy of Science lecture and posted these comments online afterward: "Dr. Pianka's talk at the TAS meeting was mostly of the problems humans are causing as we rapidly proliferate around the globe. While what he had to say is way too vast to remember it all, moreover to relay it here in this blog, the bulk of his talk was that he's waiting for the virus that will eventually arise and kill off 90% of human population.  In fact, his hope, if you can call it that, is that the ebola virus which attacks humans currently (but only through blood transmission) will mutate with the ebola virus that attacks monkeys airborne to create an airborne ebola virus that attacks humans. He's a radical thinker, that one!  I mean, he's basically advocating for the death of all but 10% of the current population!  And at the risk of sounding just as radical, I think he's right."

We now turn to the transcript, based on audio from Dr. Pianka's academy speech in March.  That such an audio-based document exists at all may be an intriguing part of this story since, according to published reports, an effort apparently was made to ensure that Dr. Pianka's speech was not recorded by video or audio.  

From Recorded Audio at speech, March 3, 2006
Texas Academy of Science 

Note: Brackets indicate possible wording. Two sets of remarks follow.  Set 1 is based on audio from the speech itself.  Set 2 is from the question and answer period that followed.  
SET ONE: From the Speech
We've got an airborne 90 percent mortality human killing [agent]. Think about that. 
Now, so far, it’s been down, down, down. Let’s start up. But we can’t get up very far. 
Aldo Leopold is one of the greatest ecologists of all times.  He was really the first conservation biologist. 
And here’s quotes from Aldo.  If you haven’t read his Sand County Almanac, I encourage you to read it. 
It was published after he died by his children [unclear]… a bunch of short stories they assembled and put together.  It's a really powerful book.  It makes me cry when I read it. 
He says the land ethic changes the role of homosapiens from conqueror to steward . . . 
It implies that we respect our fellow members and respect the community, and we respect other things on this earth.
Now, this came out of a conservation biology book.
Aldo didn’t draw this.  But it’s an ethical sequence based on Aldo.
And here you can see what you’re really familiar with: Your own self – you take care of your money, you take care of your possessions, and maybe you’re a little bit altruistic towards your brothers and sisters and uncles and aunts.  
And I think if we went back 2,000 years when we were living in a cave, we’d have these little social groups – tribes – where everybody knew everybody, and we met in caves that were like this room and older individuals told stories and younger individuals learned from them.  And there was some degree of altruism and respect, mutual respect there.  
Now we're up to the point where we have a nation and religious groups and we’re at odds within America.  50-50 split right down the middle between Democrats and Republicans.  
Let’s go out a little bit further and think about people of other [races] and other nations.
We’re not doing very well.  
What about other sentient animals?  Our closest relatives are chimpanzees and gorillas.  We don’t treat them very well. 
They’re hunting gorillas, which are on the edge of extinction, and eating them – they call it “bush meat” – in Africa.  
We subject chimps to all kinds of things in labs to create pharmaceuticals that can help us.  
I always wonder how we would feel if natural selection hadn’t taken a route that it has and if in fact chimps or gorillas or both of them were superior to us and treated us the way we treat them.  I think that would be fair.  
And finally, if we keep going out [up] and talk about all other species – and then the whole earth.
And the point here is that this is where everything is focused. And you can’t move out from it.  At least we don’t seem able to.  
Now here’s a voice crying in the wilderness. It's been widely ignored by everybody.
Herman Daly, who wrote 4 books on steady-state economics – Beyond Growth: The Economics of Sustainable Development.  He coined those terms.
And by sustainable development, I first thought those were antonyms just strung together … they couldn’t be … it weren’t possible.  
He means something a little different.  He means using renewable resources and leaving the earth the way it was when we came into it, each and everyone of us.  Which would mean population control.  
We should be born with the right to reproduce but not to overreproduce.  
We need to change our tax system so that you’re taxed for having kids rather than getting a reward. [Applause.]
Daly is being completely ignored by mainstream ecologists.  They’re all into this grow, grow, grow – the principle of a ponzi … you know, growth, a chain letter, a ponzi scheme.  
You can’t do it. 
When you hear politicians say, “We’re going to grow the economy,” think about it.  Money is debt.  For economies to grow, debt has to increase.  What we have done in spending in the last 4, 5, 6 years is put our grandchildren into debt, and their grandchildren.  And they’re never going to be able to work it off.   
If Japan, Japan finally call in all those American dollars in debt, America is going to go under.   That could happen any time.  
Here’s another sort of upside to it.  Actually, Dennis Meadows at the bottom there was asked to write this book – to do a study – using systems ecology – back in the days before pcs, and he did it in 1972, and the book was called Limits to Growth.    
And then in 1992, he and some other co-authors did a Beyond the Limits book and showed that we were over carrying capacity.
And then he enlisted his daughter, Donella, to do the 30-year update, which just came out a couple of years ago.  She’s dead now, but she was the most optimistic of all the people that wrote this book.  And you can see it in her chapter at the very end, where she talks about what we could do if we just had the will . . . . 
But anyway, he estimated that we crossed the maximum number of humans the earth could support back about 1978.  But up until then we could have eased into a sustainable world, but now we're 20% above.    
I think it’s actually much worse than that. We could not have reached six and a half billion if it weren’t for fossil fuels, to do agriculture and feed the hordes of humans around the earth. And the fossil fuels are running out.  So I think we might have to cut back to, say, two billion, which would be about one-third as many people.
This is an old figure from the Meadows 1992 Beyond the Limits book and you are here in 1999 – we’re actually out here now.  We’re starting to experience the world oil crash, and you know that every time you fill up your car. 
Here’s the most optimistic projection: Is we don’t have a collapse. 
But here’s what’s gonna happen. And after the human population collapses, there’s going to be a lot fewer of us. Food’s going to be diminished. Pollution’s going to go down, which will be good. But there’s not going to be much to recover from. Our descendants are going to curse us for the party we took, the party we had, and I really recommend Richard Heinberg’s book the [sic]Party’s Over: Oil, War, and the Fate of Industrial Societies. This man has thought about these things deeply. 
The End of Oil is good, too. But it’s not anywhere as good as the Party’s Over. 
There have been wise people for a long time – John Stuart Mill in 1858 took issue with the whole business of grow, grow, grow.  And he said he thought stationary systems made sense, stable systems.  Where you don’t have bubbles that are going to burst or you’re gonna go bankrupt.  
He said he didn’t think the people had to elbow their way to the top, to fight, struggle with each other to get the resources.  That if we could just live in a stable world where we didn’t continue to grow, and weren’t based on this grow, grow, grow thing.  That we could work on the art of living, and we could become better human beings for it.  
And these are some of the things that Donella Meadows says in the end of the Limits to Growth.
. . . . 
So, this is the end. In the 1960s when I started studying ecology, there was a lot of sand in the top of the hourglass. But in my short stint of 40, 45 years as an ecologist. Most of that sand has run out. There’s not much time left to get on an airplane, go to Madagascar, and study something while you still can. Thank you. [Applause.]
SET TWO: From the Question Session
AUDIENCE: ...nonproliferation, but after your talk I [assess] these things in a whole different light now. [Laughter.] 
PIANKA: You know the bird flu’s good, too. [Laughter.]
QUESTION: … Do you have any hope for these so-called voluntary ... Are you involved in trying to design . . . 
PIANKA: Actually, I really hope we do. I think we ought to get to Mars while we still can. Some of you brave pioneering . . . should be on a one-way spaceship to Mars. You’ll have to build yourself a greenhouse to grow your own [laughter] a hundred degrees, whatever it takes. I think we should take the Library of Congress up with us on DVDs and so when we wink out in this little sphere, there will be a little bit of a record of what happened on Earth somewhere else. And I think in that new plan, the books kids read in kindergarten will say “The Rape of the Earth, Let’s treat our planet a little better.” But I don’t think we can [unintelligible]. 
QUESTIONER: I don’t think that we as an audience accurately represent society at large.  [Laughter] What kind of reception have you received as you have presented these ideas to other audiences that are not representative of us?
PIANKA: I speak to the converted! [Considerable laughter.] [We’re not going to be all in agreement.] I know that. But we have to speak to the people that aren’t. That’s our -- a real challenge. 
And convincing ‘em when the government’s telling ‘em to keep their head buried in the sand and pretend everything’s OK isn’t going to be easy. The government’s just lying to ‘em, and they’re accepting it. 
QUESTIONER: I had a similar point. What can we do to correct this problem? It's, it all has to come from policy level because of the way human society is structured when the governments represent people.
PIANKA: Politicians can’t win elections with views like this. I could never run for office. [Laughter] [Unintelligible] [Laughter] They have to present good news to win, and they deceive themselves and deceive the public in every way they can to stay in power. Even Al Gore, who wrote the environment book, never faced overpopulation.  No politician ever has. 
The reason China was able to turn the corner and is gonna become the new super power in the world is because they got a police state and they can force people to stop reproducing. That’s the only reason they were able to turn the corner. 
QUESTIONER: [Unintelligible.]
PIANKA: . . . Well, there’s cheating going on. You can pay in China and have more. I know all that. But there’s a solution that’s theoretically possible. I call it the Johnny Anti-Appleseed Solution.  Instead of being cursed with our fertility, I would bless us with infertility. Now this could happen because male sperm counts are falling because of plastics and the estrogen [unintelligible] naturally. 
But I asked a reproductive physiologist years ago about this.  I said, “Could you design a molecule that you could administer once that would bind to the DNA to turn off reproduction and make people sterile?” And he said, yeah, theoretically. And I said, well, if you did that could you design an antidote that would unmask it just briefly for as few seconds? And he said, yeah, probably. So this is what we need. We need to sterilize everybody on the Earth [laughter] and make the antidote freely available to anybody who’s willing to work for it. 
Immediately you'd get responsible parenthood. No more juvenile delinquents, unwanted kids. You have a kid, you had to work, and you had only a few seconds to do it in. [Extended laughter] 
 . . . .  
QUESTIONER: People who are educated seem to have less children.  
PIANKA: Right. Right. Definitely, smarter people have fewer kids. I think [unintelligible] pointed this out. He said those who don’t have any conscience about the Earth are going to inherit the Earth, because those who cared made fewer babies and those who didn’t care made more babies. And so we’re [going to evolve . . .] uncaring. And I think that’s probably happening. I think IQs are falling for the same reason, too. 
MODERATOR: I think I’m gonna [unintelligible] on that. If you would like to talk to Dr. Pianka afterwards [unintelligible].
 [Prolonged standing ovation]

Also of Interest
Christianity Is a Science-Starter, Not a Science-Stopper, by Nancy Pearcey
UT Professor Supports Forrest Mims' Account of Dr. "Doom" Pianka Speech, by Rick Pearcey
Rick Pearcey is editor and publisher of The Pearcey Report (archives).

At this meeting, Prof. Pianka gave a lecture on March 3, 2006. Forrest M. Mims III, the Chairman of the Environmental Science Section of the Texas Academy of Science, who was present during the lecture, claims in a March 31, 2006 article that in this lecture Prof. Pianka "enthusiastically advocated the elimination of 90 percent of Earth's population by airborne Ebola," and that he "spoke glowingly of the police state in China that enforces their one-child policy." (See "Meeting Doctor Doom," Forrest M. Mims III, The Citizen Scientist, March 31, 2006 .)

This March 31, 2006 article by Forrest Mims touched off public controversy concerning what it is that Prof. Pianka had actually stated during his March 3, 2006 lecture. Many individuals who were not present during this March 3, 2006 lecture by Prof. Pianka have claimed that people such as Forrest Mims have misrepresented Prof. Pianka's words as part of an anti-science "witch hunt" (despite the fact that Forrest Mims is himself the Chairman of the Environmental Science Section of the Texas Academy of Science, and is one of the most widely read electronics authors in the world).

Unfortunately, during the March 3, 2006 lecture by Prof. Pianka, audio and video recording devices were ordered to be turned off. Hence, as of the date of this writing, no recording of the full March 3, 2006 lecture is known to publicly exist. An audio recording apparently was made of part of this lecture, but it apparently only caught the ending of it. For a transcript of this partial recording, see "Dr. 'Doom' Pianka Speaks: Transcript From the Speech That Started It All," Pearcey Report, April 6, 2006 .

But even though a full record is not currently known to publicly exist of what Prof. Pianka said during his March 3, 2006 lecture, I will present other sources of evidence which strongly demonstrate that Forrest Mims did not misrepresent what Prof. Pianka said during this lecture, and that Forrest Mims's account of the lecture is accurate.

“We cannot leap into world government in one quick step… The precondition for ... genuine globalization is progressive regionalization, because thereby we move toward larger, more stable, more cooperative units.” Keynote speaker Zbigniew Brzezinski, former head of the Trilateral Commission [now a foreign policy adviser to Barack Obama].

     Organized by the Gorbachev Foundation, the first annual State of the World Forum convened in San Francisco on September 27, 1995. The former head of the Communist empire had gathered "nearly 500 senior states-people, political leaders, spiritual leaders, scientists, intellectuals, business executives, artists and youth from 50 nations to begin a process of deliberation on the central question of what priorities, values and actions should guide humanity as it moves into the next phase of development." said Jim Garrison, President of the Gorbachev Foundation. 

      "Human interdependence," he continued, "must now become our watchword as we move into the global civilization which lies ahead: interdependence with each other, interdependence with the earth, interdependence with the Spirit [not the Holy Spirit] which perennially guides the affairs of humankind."

      Perhaps the most powerful of these global elites was Zbigniew Brzezinski. See more here: Elite Conspiracies & Zbigniew Brzezinski


...Dr. Deepak Chopra, Director of the Institute for Mind/Body Medicine in San Diego who shared his view of today's crisis of perception and the evolution of consciousness. "The universe is seeking to fulfill itself through us," he said. "Are we up to the responsibility?" His next point shows the much repeated motif of the conference,

"Can you step out of the river of your own conditioning and see the world as if for the first time? For only then is there an opportunity to create a new body -- but more importantly, a new world. We cannot do it the way we have done it in the past. It is time to change the whole paradigm through which we view physical reality."  

The world leaders gathered in San Francisco on the evening of September 28 had already made that paradigm shift, By the end of the second day of the conference, it was obvious that the selected speakers and most of the enthusiastic audience viewed reality from a decidedly universalist perspective. The cultural paradigm (social consciousness or world view) expressed in the roundtable discussions, in the plenary speeches, and among the youth from nations, left little doubt that this group of statesmen and potential leaders shared Gorbachev's global vision.  

The former Soviet leader was both idol and tyrant, and the speakers expressed their reverence. Most major session and many smaller forums ended with summary statements by Gorbachev who praised those who echoed his sentiments and corrected those who deviated from his revised party line. Chastising American individualism, democracy, decadence and resistance to UN-style globalism, he defended his own Communist record. And while acknowledging that his Communist government had made mistakes, his

Again and again, the Communist leader and his hand-picked "council of the wise" or "global brain trust" (does that sound like "democracy" or elitist tyranny?) told the assembly of more than 1000 guests and participants that a new set of inclusive universal values must replace the Judeo-Christian world view. "The wisdom distilled by all faiths" must determine the values needed to guide the world into the 21st Century.

That means that familiar terms must be redefined to fit the new global perspective -- and the old beliefs and political systems must be abandoned. Poverty and oppression must be eradicated, and a new kind of equality must be established.  [See The Secret Cabal]

To broaden his base, Gorbachev linked his futurist visions to the world's timeless traditions. As in our new schools, all earth-centered or universalist religions fit the global model -- but Biblical monotheism (belief in the biblical God) is despised! No wonder the religious leaders invited to address the Forum taught pantheism (all is god since one cosmic force connects all things), universalism (all paths lead to the same ultimate reality), and monism (all is one) as its spiritual foundation.

Among them were New Age educator Willis Harman, Esalen co-founder Michael Murphy, the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation Founder Sonia Gandhi, and the respective leaders of Vietnamese, Mongolian, and Cambodian Buddhism. Their input during panel discussion and roundtable sessions left no doubt that biblical Christianity was marked for decay.  

The absence of Christian leaders prompted a member of the press to ask Gorbachev why Western religious leaders were not represented at the conference. Showing his ignorance of Christianity, the Communist leader answered that "Western religion is represented by many of the leaders of the Forum."  

You might wonder whom he had in mind. Surely he didn't mean his co-chair Ted Turner, astronomer Carl Sagan, Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates, Carnegie Chairman David Hamburg, or Maurice Strong, the Canadian New Age chief of the UN's 1992 environmental conference in Rio de Janeiro?  

Attempting to help answer the question, Zbigniew Brzezinski, former National Security Advisor to President Carter, CFR (Council of Foreign Relations) and former director of the Trilateral Commission, spoke up:

"I happen to know that President Gorbachev is a very good friend of the Pope -- and I am too."  

Did he think this input would satisfy the need for Christian representation?  

Apparently, Gorbachev and his "council of wise" world leaders just don't understand. Looking at reality through the utopian filter of the new global paradigm, they have no idea what Christians believe nor the value of the liberty we treasure -- the unique freedoms established by the God who made America great.  


The Communist leader never admitted openly that individualism was incompatible with the new world order. But several of his plenary speakers did. Astronomer Carl Sagan explained it well. He showed us pictures of our tiny blue planet in the midst of a vast galaxy in a far vaster universe --- then scolded those who still view the minuscule individuals of the earth as significant pieces in the immense cosmic puzzle. In other words, the whole or the collective is what counts -- not the people.  

This new paradigm turns all our American values upside down. Gorbachev may tout "consensus" and "synthesis" as the means to peace and security, but his ambiguous blends would drown Western capitalism in the sea of global socialism. Remember, his idea of "democratizing" the world eliminates all the human rights guaranteed by the US Constitution. He demands the abolition of poverty everywhere, but at the cost of American resources. He wants equality for all -- except the elite ruling class....

The world's spiritual and environmental leaders who endorse him seem to have forgotten that Gorbachev's atheist reign in the USSR spawned unequaled environmental devastation. Could his professed concerns for the poor and for nature be mere political stepping stones to greater power?  [See Green Lies and Phony Science]

At the end of the conference, the publisher of Earth Vision magazine shared with me her disappointment over the hypocrisy she sensed. "I don't believe they really care all that much about the poor," she said. "An evening meal here costs over $120 per person, yet they talk about equality, justice, and raising consciousness. Why couldn't they have served just one meal of rice? That would have done more to raise our awareness than all their promising words."  

Just then, Shirley McLaine walked by, so I asked her what she thought of the conference. 

"It was good. It helped raise consciousness," she answered. 

"But wouldn't it have raised consciousness more if one of the meals had just been rice instead of gourmet meat and elegant desserts?" I asked.

She frowned. "People paid a lot of money to come here," she answered and walked away.

Our report on the 1996 gathering:  The State of the World According to Gorbachev

Home | Armor of God | Persecution | Articles | Books