Institution for
Authority Research
Two Roads: Didactic or Dialectic and their praxis - Part 2
To obey or to circumvent?—that is the question.
by Dean Gotcher -
October 10, 2007
L. S. Vygotsky, in
his book Mind in Society: the development of higher
psychological development wrote “to study something means to
study it in the process of change; that is the dialectical
method’s basic demand.” "If you don't change, you are going to
be left behind" seems to be the banner displayed in every church
today. This change is not directed to your heart in relationship
to God (repent of your sin—quit your justifying for your
justification is found in Christ and in him alone), in other
words the crisis of life is not between you and God, but rather
the focus is upon relationship with others (situation
ethics—justified compromise for your justification is found in
what the group thinks, in the consensus) where the crisis of
life is between you and others. This shift in crisis is the
shift in paradigm. “The eclipse of a way thinking cannot take
place without a crisis.” Antonio Gramsci The shift in crisis
solution (responding to "changing" times) is a change from
evaluating the situation from God's position, then repenting and
depending upon him, to the evaluating of situations, the crisis
of the time, from the groups position, then confessing before
others of your individualism (hoarding of resources, including
your feelings) and the need for your dependence upon others (the
group). The shift is from "But my God shall supply all your need
according to his riches in glory by Christ Jesus." (Philippians
4:19) to the village shall supply all your "felt" needs
according to the resources it has at hand (distributed to you
according to their perception of your "felt" needs, you hug them
and then they hug you, maybe). "Thus saith the LORD; Cursed be
the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and
whose heart departeth from the LORD." Jeremiah 17:5
Are you standing in the way?
Jesus called himself "the way." The early church was called "the
way." Both praxised the way of obedience to God, even to death.
The "way" being presented today is that of seeking common ground
through sensation or feelings (how we make one another feel).
Marcuse saw it this way: “... the aesthetic dimension and the
corresponding feeling of pleasure ... is the center of the mind
... medium [whereby] nature [ i.e. sensuousness] becomes
susceptible to freedom, necessity to autonomy [con-sensuous
determined laws, i.e. where sensuousness and morality are
synthesized, the emerging synthesis is synergy: "Partnership is
the same as synergy. Synergy can be defined as the resolution
[synthesis] of the dichotomy between selfishness and
unselfishness (altruism)." God says humble and deny yourself,
not to worship or sacrifice yourself. "The problem for the
accountants is to work out some way of putting on the balance
sheet the amount of synergy in the organization, the amount of
time and money and effort that has been invested in getting
groups to work together." Abraham Maslow Maslow on Management].”
He identified, as did others, that Kant's Critique of Judgment,
his aesthetic dimension, was the pathway out from under God's
law (seen as repression since there is no intent in diaprax to
repent) and the pathway to finding peace in mankind's
ever-changing, ever-common laws of the flesh (freedom to be
one's self in harmony with others). “These archetypes envisioned
the fulfillment of man and nature, not through domination and
exploitation, but through release of inherent libidinal forces
[the sensations of the flesh: touch, taste, smell, sight,
sound].” (Marcuse) Marcuse wrote: “... (O)n the basis of Kant’s
theory, the aesthetic function becomes ... the philosophy of
culture ... a non-repressive civilization, in which reason is
sensuous and sensuousness rational ... [according to Schiller
this gives hope to] the possibility of a new reality principle
.” From this foundation the transformational Marxists,
socio-psychologists, justify their diabolical dialectical
praxis. Total Quality Management, Total Quality Leadership,
Outcome Based Education, School-to-Work, DARE, COPS, HMO, Church
Growth, Emerging Church, etc. are built upon this "secularized
Satanism, intellectualized witchcraft," "sin is in!" foundation.
Those who follow "the way" of Christ Jesus are standing in the
way, standing in the way of the world, that is. The worlds
attitude is "Get out of our way or we will annihilate you." Of
course they say they are doing it in "love"—Eros.
The pathway to "peace"
The "logical outgrowth" of diaprax
It is not how far down the road you have traveled, it is the
road that you are taking.
"And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness
comprehended it not." John 1:5
"Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the
world giveth, give I unto you. Let not your heart be troubled,
neither let it be afraid." John 14:27
"Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to
send peace, but a sword." Matthew 10:34
"For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden
destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with
child; and they shall not escape." 1 Thessalonians 5:3
"Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad
is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which
go in thereat: Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the
way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it."
Mathew 7: 13, 14
The Tower of Babel and God's obstruction to peace on earth:
"The dialectical method was overthrown―the parts were prevented
from finding their definition within the whole."
Marx The Holy Family
If man is ever to find "freedom," Marcuse believed that the
absence of authoritarian domination, judgment, and repression
must be actualized in both the individual and society, where
both subject (man, children) and object (God, parents) must
build relationship through the use of discourse
(anti-revelation), where differing parties must focus on the
identification of common "felt" needs, desires ,and attributes
and common means of "actualizing" them; “... the autonomy of the
subject is to have an ‘effect’ in the objective reality, and the
ends that the subject sets for itself must be real [attainable
by all, i.e. carnal].” This very praxis negates any voice as
worthy of consideration if it speaks outside the naturally
attainable desires, "felt" needs, of the moment, in other words
it must be apprehensible by natural man and can not be above his
discursive abilities in the moment—this affectively negates
revelation. The child's "Why?" (discourse, pathway toward the
satisfaction of sensuous needs, i.e. freedom), to the parents
"Not" (categorical imperative, pathway of repression), must
become accepted as the pathway of deliverance, both for God and
man, parent and child, owner and worker, teacher and student
etc. (the public private partnership). Any "authority figure"
who does not or can not participate in this discourse
(willingness to change, to see it differently, to perceive it
outside God's, parent's, position) must be regarded as
irrational, unreal, and therefore irrelevant. He and his laws
(commands) would therefore become negated. This would not only
free the "church" from an autocratic God but also his autocratic
law, freeing man from both the Patriarch (that which is above,
external repression) and his own conscience (that which is
below, internal repression), freeing all from that which is
above. Thereby the distinction between sacred and secular become
blurred if not moribund.
“God is conceived more directly after a parental image and thus
as a source of support and as a guiding and sometimes punishing
authority.” Theodore Adorno The Authoritarian Personality
"The guilty conscience is formed in childhood by the
incorporation of the parents." (Brown) Karl Marx understood this
link when he wrote “Once the earthly family is discovered to be
the secret of the heavenly family the former must itself be
annihilated, both in theory and in practice.” Karl Marx
Feuerbach Thesis #4 In other words, once you realize that the
earthly parents, who give commands to their children and
chastens them when they disobey, praxis the same paradigm as
God, who gives commands to his children and chasten them when
they disobey ("Mortify therefore your members which are upon the
earth; fornication, uncleanness, inordinate affection, evil
concupiscence, and covetousness, which is idolatry: For which
things’ sake the wrath of God cometh on the children of
disobedience: In the which ye also walked some time, when ye
lived in them." Colossians 3:5-7), the traditional parent
paradigm must be neutralized, marginalized and
removed—annihilated. Since God, to Marx, was illusionary,
children must come to see and respond to parental authority as
illusionary. This is a praxis (system, practice, purpose) which
would eventually destroy the traditionally family paradigm
(patricide) and thereby negate a Godly paradigm in the mind of
the individual—brainwashing, brain detachment. This would also
sanitize the community of any patriarchal praxis, whereby the
"village" would refuse its exercise in all policy situations,
from the home to the highest political offices. This is the
purpose of a soviet system. Thus, any person continuing to
praxis a patriarchal paradigm would be considered neurotic. Any
effort they might make to support their didactic praxis, by
cautioning others of the dialectical praxis, would be seen as
divisive. And any effort they would make to propagate the praxis
of a patriarchal paradigm—"Do it my way or else," producing a
sense of guilt and fear of judgment upon others—would be seen as
an act of hate.
“Freud commented that only through the solidarity of all the
participants could the sense of guilt be assuaged.” Norman O.
Brown Life against Death
"One of the most fascinating aspects of group therapy is that
everyone is born again, born together in the group."
Irvin D. Yalom Theory and Practice and Group Psychotherapy
“It is not individualism that fulfills the individual, on the
contrary it destroys him. Society is the necessary framework
through which freedom and individuality are made realities… only
in a socialist society.” Karl Marx
According to Marcuse “... the origin of repression leads back to
the origin of instinctual repression ... early childhood.” In
other words, the enforced commands of parents (negative force
field) repress the child's natural urges which drive him
(natural inclination), as the environment draws him (positive
force field), into discovering his true identity and purpose in
the world, causing a "self-environmental dialectical rift," what
Freud called neurosis and Marx called alienation and
reification. “... the ‘external restrictions’ which first the
parents and then other societal agencies have imposed upon the
individual ‘interjected’ into the ego and become its
‘conscience’; henceforth, the sense of guilt permeates the
mental life.” “The id carries the memory traces of the dominion
... forward into every present future: it projects the past into
the future.” (Marcuse) Brown defined the difference between the
conscience and what Freud called the 'super-ego': “What we call
‘conscience’ perpetuates inside of us our bondage to past
objects now part of ourselves: the super-ego ‘unites in itself
the influences of the present and of the past.’” “Eros is
fundamentally a desire for union with objects in the world.”
“Eros is the foundation of morality.” (Brown)
While the superego finds morality within social sensuousness
(Eros), the conscience finds morality above both individual
(self) and societal (environment) sensuousness. The later is
caused as a result of a traditional family structure, which must
be annihilated for the expressed purpose of initiating and
sustaining a world unity and peace built upon Eros—"making love
not war." A "change agent" must properly identify what it is he
wants to change, or annihilate, before he begins the change
process. The following quotation explains what it is that needs
to be identified and annihilated if it can not be changed.
“Social control is most effective at the individual level. The
personal conscience is the key element in ensuring self-control,
refraining from deviant behavior even when it can be easily
perpetrated.” “The family, the next most important unit
affecting social control, is obviously instrumental in the
initial formation of the conscience and in the continued
reinforcement of the values that encourage law abiding
behavior.” “... social control is now often more dependent on
external control [the village and the police state], than on
internal self-control [the individual and the family].” Dr.
Robert Trojanowicz The meaning of “Community” in Community
Policing Trojanowicz Dr. Trojanowicz was noted for his
development of the Community Oriented Police System (COPS), a
soviet structured policing procedure, now a standard for police
training across America. He then acknowledges the necessity to
place the community between the child and the parent, if a
globalization of the community is to be actualized. "The theme
underlying much of the research is that once you can identify a
community, you have discovered the primary unity of society
ABOVE the level of the individual and the family that can be
mobilized to take concerted action to bring about POSITIVE
SOCIAL CHANGE." Dr. Robert Trojanowicz, et al. (emphasis added)
Thus "positive social law" (collective man) determines worth,
not a voice above man's common "felt" needs. No longer God or
any objective force (law) above the common human experience is
permitted jurisdiction in setting social policy. This is the
difference between Lex-Rex and Rex-Lex (law above man—conscience
above Eros—and man above law—Eros above conscience), the
difference between a constitutional republic and a democracy,
the difference between rule by principles (Truth) and rule by
the mob (feelings) i.e. you either persuade with facts or
influence through feelings.
In the book, which I call "A Cookbook on Humans," Human
Relations in Curriculum Change, edited by Kenneth Benne, we find
the the outcome of a dialectical praxis, where the man who is
based on persuasion (knowing) must be replaced (negated) by the
man who is based on influence (thinking through one's feelings).
“We must develop persons who see non-influencability of private
convictions[*] in joint deliberations as a vice rather than a
virtue.” Kenneth Benne Human Relations in Curriculum Change *
people with principles, not swayed by opinions of men, deductive
in thought and not easily or quickly moved by inductive
"reasoning." "The ideal of democratic [globalist, socialist,
communist, environmentalist] deliberation is an intelligent and
uncoerced [anti-patriarch] consensus concerning what should be
done. This consensus will attempt to incorporate the valid
[social, materialistic] insights and values of all parties in
the conflict. The validity of these various insights and values
is to be tested [dialectically evaluated—looked at through
"neo-Marxist lens"] by the common study, deliberation, and
discussion of the group and ultimately by the consequences of
the common plan [negation of patriarchal leadership in setting
policy] as it works out in action [sanitization of patriarchal
praxis from the social praxis] and as these consequences are
evaluated by the common judgment of the group [what the "group
think"s]. It cannot be stressed too emphatically that the ideal
goal of democratic co-operation is a consensus in the group
concerning what should be done—a consensus based on and
sustained by the deliberation of the group in the planning,
execution, and evaluation of the common action of the group [a
soviet method of policy making-used to neutralize, marginalize
and remove patriarchal outcomes]. No other method of social
control depends so crucially on the deliberation of the whole
group concerned in resolving the conflicts ["right" vs. "wrong"
i.e. the conscience] which for the time impede and prevent
community of action [commun-ism]. And, as a corollary, no other
method of social control depends so centrally for its effective
working-out upon the habituation and responsible discipline
[brainwashing] of all of its members in conscious methods of
deliberation and discussion." ibid.
The Enemy Within
Trafficking with the enemy ... collaborating with and giving aid
and comfort to the enemy.
What every person does when they come to a consensus with a
facilitator, over social issues, in a diverse group, seeking
common ground through discourse (to praxis a soviet system to
solve public-private, individual-social problems).
It is not the problem being solved which is at issue here, it is
the paradigm being used to resolve it. Jesus needed food to stay
alive, yet he refused to go into discourse with Satan on how to
obtain it. He refused to praxis a dialectical, heresiarchal,
inductive paradigm. The trickery of those who attempt to
initiate and sustain a dialectical paradigm is their relentless
effort to inject themselves into the middle of a conflict as
agents of mediation between opposing positions for the sake of
all parties involved. Without the heat of a crises they can not
function in stealth. All have had training in presenting the
"appropriate answers" to the "appropriate questions" which
guarantee the "appropriate information" being introduced and
used in the "group think" meeting, to guarantee the "appropriate
method" being used to set policy and make decisions. The
"appropriate outcome" is the praxis of the dialectical paradigm,
the negation ("annihilation") of a patriarchal paradigm.
A Federally funded book on how this is done reads: A "change
agent... should know about the process of change, how it takes
place and the attitudes, values and behaviors that usually act
as barriers.... He should know who in his system are the
'defenders' or resisters of innovations [innovation is the code
word for change of ones paradigm to a dialectical, relativistic,
humanistic paradigm]." Ronald Havelock The Change Agents Guide
to Innovation in Education 1973 Carl Rogers pushed for the same
dialectical paradigm "What we need to learn, it seems, are ways
of gaining acceptance for a humanistic person-centered venture
in a culture more devoted to rule by authority." Carl Rogers
Freedom To Learn FOR THE 80’S in his chapter Some
Disappointments in Innovation A Pattern of Failure As Abraham
Maslow wrote: "We don’t know the answers to the question: What
proportion of the population is irreversibly authoritarian
[non-innovative, believers]?" Abraham Maslow Maslow on
Management The benchmark Federal document, authorizing the
criterion for the use of federal grants in all educational
institutions, reads: “During the period of innovation, an
environment is invisible. The present is always invisible
because the whole field of attention is so saturated with it. It
becomes visible only when is has been superseded by a new
environment [ a new paradigm]." Federal Education Grant, Dec.
1969 Behavior Science in Teacher Education Program p. 237 In
Theodor Adorno's book, The Authoritarian Personality, the book
used to justify the use of Freud and Marx in the American class
room, reads: “Another aspect of traditionalism is the tendency
to oppose innovations or alterations of existing
politic‑economic forms.” (Adorno)
The two roles of the facilitator are: 1) get everyone to think
global (environmental) through the use of global or
environmental crisis; 2) get them to act local, to question all
local authorities who prevent a global focus, to question the
authority of those who do not look outside the home, the
community, the nation, for answers to their problems. These
people can be identified through their use of the language of
restrain (belief, "good" vs. "evil") and their use of actions of
resistance (patriarchal paradigm). This dialectical agenda is
being used all around the world today. "Former" communist
Estonia's "new" education program promotes this same globalist
agenda (disguised as local):
"Robert Young sees Habermas [*a Marxist-see below] speaking on
macroeducational questions and on 'learning levels' of societies
and bringing in as the main macroproblem characteristic the
problem of difference (that roots in the history of
globalisation of culture and communication). This idea
corresponds to the idea of Learning Estonia - where the high
innovation capacity and integration on the global and local
level is one of the key-assumptions. 'But the microproblem is
the problem of critique. This problem manifests itself as the
problem of interpretation, dialogue and, in some sense
'relatively autonomous', praxis for intellectuals and
professionals, including teachers and learners' (Young, p 21).
The scenario-development process itself is already appeared to
be the strong voice of critique. And as the scenario-studies
have become the entire part of different teacher training
courses in Tallinn Pedagogical University and in in-service
training and in the big projects as 'Quality-School of Estonia'
(40 school-teams and 40 consultants), it works in teacher
discourse, and shows the signs to become one of narratives to
'approve or try out the direction of progress' in everyday
(pedagogical) life." Teacher education in a postmodern society:
an Estonian perspective POLITICAL AND SOCIAL TRANSFORMATIONS:
ANALYSIS IN NATIONAL CONTEXT Ene-Silvia Sarv from chapter 6. The
interpretation of previous as "Estonian Condition of
post-modernity," section 6.1. Some short theoretical thoughts
This article also promotes the use of current educational
practices in America (dialectical education) as the proper
method for globalization. Recognizing Hilda Taba, a Communist
from Estonia who became a popular innovator in the globalization
(communization) of the America education system, it reads:
"The main ideas of J. Käis pedagogy were 1) integration of the
different ideas of western innovative pedagogy into one system;
2) recognition of only such ideas of western innovative pedagogy
which can be directly applied in public school. (Inge Unt
'Impact of American Progressive Education on the Didactic system
of Johannes Käis. Hilda Taba`s Article 'Governing Directions in
American Education' in Jubilee Conference Hilda Taba - 90.
Invited Addresses and Reports, Tartu 1992, p 142 - 147, 144).
His model to put his innovations into practice involved step-by
step movement from idea and its integration into one system to
textbooks and worksheets system, actual introduction into school
practice via teachers in-service training and feedback system. "
ibid
This same agenda is expressed in Richard Paul's works in
America: “Only by bringing out the child’s own ideas in
dialogical and dialectical settings can the child begin to
reconstruct and progressively transcend concepts [to negate the
patriarchal paradigm, by questioning their parents authority
locally as well as thinking globally, environmentally,
cosmically, i.e. thinking "outside the box."].” Richard Paul
Critical Thinking Handbook Just getting the next generation to
rebel against their parents would produce anarchy and
destruction, they had to at the same time be re-aligned within
groups to the global agenda through their discourse with others
on social issues outside their home, county, state, and nation.
“In fact, a large part of what we call “good teaching” is the
teacher’s ability to attain affective objectives through
challenging the student’s fixed beliefs [questioning their
parents paradigm] and getting them to discuss issues [collective
paradigm].” Benjamin Bloom Taxonomy of Educational Objectives
Book 2 Affective Domain p. 54 This is something the traditional,
patriarchal paradigm would not knowingly permit.
*"In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself in the other,
they experience the common ground of their existence." "the
revolution that must occur is the reaction of suppressed life,
which will visit the causality of fate upon the rulers."
[patricide; annihilate the patriarchal paradigm] "Therefore the
dialectic of the moral life must repeat itself until the
materialist spell that is cast upon the reproduction of social
life, the Biblical curse of necessary labor, is broken
technologically." Jürgen Habermas Knowledge & Human Interest,
1968, publ. Polity Press, 1987. Chapter Three: The Idea of the
Theory of Knowledge as Social Theory emphasis added
Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put
darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for
sweet, and sweet for bitter! Isaiah 5:20
"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou
hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou
shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of
thy God, I will also forget thy children." Hosea 4:6
The annihilation of the traditional home.
The emancipation of hedonism.
(How homosexuality, lesbianism, pedophilia, bestiality etc. is
taking over America and the world, with religious support.)
“While adult sexuality serves the socially useful purpose of
breeding children, it is for the individual in some sense an end
in itself as a source of pleasure – according to Freud, the
highest pleasure.” (Brown)
"But she that liveth in pleasure is dead while she liveth."
Titus 5:6
Marcuse saw a hope, which Freud did not, in how mankind could
overcome the repressive cultural condition of domination, a
condition which found its origin in obedience to God, the
traditional home, and the conscience. “The historical
possibility of a gradual decontrolling of the instinctual
development [the "decontrolling" of the conscience over the id;
i.e. let's be positive (love the creation, love pleasure) and
not negative (love the creator, love God)] must be taken
seriously, perhaps even the historical necessity – if
civilization is to progress to a higher stage of freedom.”
(Marcuse). This "higher stage of freedom" carries with it some
calamitous concerns for mankind. It carries with it a mandate
for the liberation of behavior which God calls abomination:
homosexuality, lesbianism, pedophilia, bestiality, all that
which is highly esteemed among men. “Non-repressive order is
possible only if the sex instincts can generate lasting erotic
relations among mature individuals ... a ‘libidinal rationality’
which ... promotes progress toward higher forms of civilized
freedom.” "The road to 'higher culture' leads through the true
love of boys (όρζως παιδεραστειν)." translated by B. Jowett as
"under the influence of true love." Consider the fact that
Freud's mythological Greek hero was Orpheus who "... set the
example for the people of Thrace of giving his love to tender
boys, and enjoyed the springtime and first flower of their
growth.'" Orpheus is the Greek figure who represents "... the
introduction of homosexuality," the unifying of all things
natural. Marcuse “Universal Reconciliation ... relies on a
reason that is before reason-mimesis or ‘impulse.’” Jürgen
Habermas The Theory of Communicative Action. 1981, p. 382
“Impulse, the primary fact, back of which, psychically we cannot
go.” John Dewey, “Social Psychology,” Psychological Review, I
(July, 1894), p. 404
"I speak that which I have seen with my Father: and ye do that
which ye have seen with your father. They answered and said unto
him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were
Abraham’s children, ye would do the works of Abraham. But now ye
seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I
have heard of God: this did not Abraham. Ye do the deeds of your
father. Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication; we
have one Father, even God. Jesus said unto them, If God were
your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came
from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me. Why do ye
not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word.
Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye
will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in
the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a
lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of
it. And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not." John
8: 38-45
"He that loveth his life shall lose it; and he that hateth his
life in this world shall keep it unto life eternal. If any man
serve me, let him follow me; and where I am, there shall also my
servant be: if any man serve me, him will my Father honour."
John 12: 25, 26
"For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in
heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother." Matthew
12:50
"Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into
the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father
which is in heaven." Matthew 7:21
"For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me,
he gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should
speak. And I know that his commandment is life everlasting:
whatsoever I speak therefore, even as the Father said unto me,
so I speak." John 12: 49, 50
“‘Every renunciation ... becomes a ... conscience; every fresh
abandonment of gratification increases its severity and
intolerance ... every impulse of aggression which we omit to
gratify is taken over by the super-ego and goes to heighten its
aggressiveness (against the ego).’ ‘That which began in relation
to the father ends in relation to the community.’” Freud
Civilization and Its Discontents, 1949 in Herbert Marcuse's book
Eros and Civilization
"Higher Civilization"
"And he said unto them, Ye are from beneath; I am from above: ye
are of this world; I am not of this world. I said therefore unto
you, that ye shall die in your sins: for if ye believe not that
I am he, ye shall die in your sins." John 8:23, 24
In the dialectical praxis, where "as above, so below" and "as
below, so above" become actualized, this "higher civilization,"
as Marcuse calls it, must be grounded not only upon Marx's
sociological praxis but also upon Freud's psychological praxis.
“Freud ... compares the attitude of civilization toward
sexuality.” “... lasting erotic relations among mature
individuals ... a ‘libidinal rationality’...” (Marcuse). Freud
saw the conflict in civilization as one where sex (the sensuous:
touch, taste, sight, smell, sound) plays the determinant agent
“‘... The conflict between civilization and sexuality is caused
by the circumstance that sexual love is a relationship between
two people,...” "'... whereas civilization is founded on
relations between large groups of persons. (... the effort) to
combine organic substances into ever larger unities,’ to
‘establish ever greater unities and to preserve them thus―in
short, to bind together?’” Freud Civilization and Its
Discontents (Marcuse). Freud then reveals his true sexual bias:
“‘In no other case does Eros so plainly betray the core of his
being, his aim of making one out of many; but when he has
achieved it in the proverbial way through the love of two human
beings, he is not willing to go further.’” ibid. (bold added) In
other words a patriarch paradigm (procreation—husband, wife)
predominates with mankind and not a matriarchal/heresiarchal
paradigm (adulterous-homosexual culture) As Marcuse explains:
“... according to Freud, the drive toward ever larger unities
belongs to the biological-organic nature of Eros itself.” “This
dialectic constitutes the unexplored and tabooed core of Freud’s
metapsychology.”
"But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own
lust, and enticed. Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth
forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death."
James 1:14-15
"For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good
thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that
which is good I find not. For the good that I would I do not:
but the evil which I would not, that I do. Now if I do that I
would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in
me. I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is
present with me. For I delight in the law of God after the
inward man: But I see another law in my members, warring against
the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of
sin which is in my members. O wretched man that I am! who shall
deliver me from the body of this death? I thank God through
Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the
law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin." Romans 7:18, 25
"As the Father hath loved me, so have I loved you: continue ye
in my love. If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my
love; even as I have kept my Father’s commandments, and abide in
his love. These things have I spoken unto you, that my joy might
remain in you, and that your joy might be full. This is my
commandment, That ye love one another, as I have loved you.
Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life
for his friends. Ye are my friends, if ye do whatsoever I
command you." John 15: 9-14
"Will the real Sigmund Freud please step forward."
"Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which
minister questions, rather than godly edifying which is in
faith:"
Titus 1:4
"For the time will come when they will not endure sound
doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to
themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn
away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto
fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4
"Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times
some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing
spirits, and doctrines of devils; Speaking lies in hypocrisy;
having their conscience seared with a hot iron; Forbidding to
marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath
created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe
and know the truth. For every creature of God is good, and
nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving: For
it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer.
If thou put the brethren in remembrance of these things, thou
shalt be a good minister of Jesus Christ, nourished up in the
words of faith and of good doctrine, whereunto thou hast
attained. But refuse profane and old wives’ fables, and exercise
thyself rather unto godliness. For bodily exercise profiteth
little: but godliness is profitable unto all things, having
promise of the life that now is, and of that which is to come.
This is a faithful saying and worthy of all acceptation. For
therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust
in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of
those that believe. These things command and teach." 1 Timothy
4:1, 11
"Freud noted that … patricide and incest … are part of man’s
deepest nature."
Irvin Yalom Theory and Practice and Group Psychotherapy
The pathway of repression in civilization, according to Freud's
fable, is caused by a patriarchal figure. “The primal father,
... the archetype of domination, [who] initiates the chain
reaction of enslavement, rebellion, and the reinforced
domination which marks the history of civilization.” (Marcuse).
According to Freud, the sequence of "historical" events which
initiated repression began when the sons sought sexual relations
(sensual pleasure: touch, taste, sight, sound, smell—it is
important to note this is not for the purpose of procreation,
but for the satisfaction of "felt" needs, urges) with their
mother (triggering events which led up to the Oedipus complex).
According to Marcuse, “... the prehistory of the sense of guilt
... has ‘its origin in the Oedipus complex and was acquired when
the father was killed by the association of the brothers.’ [the
brotherhood, the fraternity]” According to Freud the sons kill
the father to regain sensuous relationship with the mother,
which was forbidden by the father, but their praxis of
domination produces guilt within them resulting in their
establishing laws of "repression" upon themselves and their
clan, separating others from gaining sensuous relationship
("self-actualized 'felt' needs") with the mother. As a result
civilization was created: "... original domination becomes
eternal, cosmic, and good, and in this form guards the process
of civilization.” “The ‘historical rights’ of the primal father
are restored.” (Marcuse) Supposedly, with the expansion of the
guilty conscience, which followed the sons killing of their
father, “[t]he despot-patriarch has succeeded in implanting his
reality principle in the rebellious sons.” (Brown) The
patriarchal paradigm, the father figure, i.e. the top-down
husband-wife-children hierarchal institute, the bourgeois (the
middle-class establishment), dominate again the matriarchal
paradigm, the mother i.e. mother-earth or natural resources,
thereby preventing the heresiarchal paradigm, the adolescent,
the proletariat (the lower class), from attaining
self-actualization, i.e. the praxis of incest, a sibling-mother
orgiastic consensus. Instead of bending your knee before God
(fear God) you now bend your knee before the village (fear man)
for your daily "felt" needs.
"And when he had called the people unto him with his disciples
also, he said unto them, Whosoever will come after me, let him
deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me. For
whosoever will save his life shall lose it; but whosoever shall
lose his life for my sake and the gospel’s, the same shall save
it. For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole
world, and lose his own soul? Or what shall a man give in
exchange for his soul? Whosoever therefore shall be ashamed of
me and of my words in this adulterous and sinful generation; of
him also shall the Son of man be ashamed, when he cometh in the
glory of his Father with the holy angels." Mark 8: 34-38
Phantasy
The subconscious memory of Eros seeking actualization;
hallucination, to delude, to mislead the mind of judgment, to
deceive, trickery.
"But, beloved, remember ye the words which were spoken before of
the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ;" Jude 1:17
Jude 1:4-25
Memory becomes a key factor, either continuing
repression-domination or eliminating it, depending upon how
memory is defined. According to dialectical reasoning, memory,
when applied to the past standards of civilization, acts as an
agent of repression, but when applied to the present "felt"
needs of society, the carnal inclinations of the flesh, the
"Great Refusal," it acts as an agent of "deliverance." It
becomes the pathway of salvation. “If the guilt accumulated in
the civilized domination of man by man can ever be redeemed by
freedom, then the ‘original sin’ must be committed again: ‘We
must again eat from the tree of knowledge in order to fall back
into the state of innocence." It is the memory of innocence
(unrestrained Eros) which draws man again to eat from the
forbidden tree. "...the pleasure principle is not redeemed ...
liberated [because t]he sense of guilt is sustained...‘the
consequence of uncommitted aggression ...,” (Brown) In other
words, it is not enough to remove the patriarchal from society,
his importance must also be removed (washed) from one's thought
process, giving him recognition results in the toleration of
intolerance, i.e. the acceptance of absolutes, the unquestioned
obedience to authority. The "great refusal" (mans carnal nature,
the laws of the flesh) triggers the questioning of everything
which inhibits its actualization. “Some tolerant people are
fighters. . . they are intolerant of intolerance.... Whether the
tolerant person is militant or pacifistic, he is very likely to
be liberal in his political views.” (Adorno)
With the aid of psychoanalysis, Marcuse saw memory (the
"ought"—Eros restrained but subconsciously the desire retained)
as a apparatus to be used in assisting mankind out of the
repressive standards of the present civilization. “The
rediscovered past yields critical standards which are tabooed by
the present.” “... the restoration of memory is accompanied by
the restoration of the cognitive content of phantasy.” “...
psychoanalytic theory recaptures the strict truths of
daydreaming and fiction.” "Memory," the law of the flesh,
therefore, is an organ, a truth, which remembers currently
suppressed carnal urges of past erotic acts of childhood,
natural acts which were suppressed by parent standards. Thus it
serve as a tool for the therapist, as it did for Satan in the
Garden in Eden. “If memory moves into the center of
psychoanalysis as a decisive mode of cognition, this is far more
than a therapeutic device; the therapeutic role of memory
derives from the truth value of memory.” “Its truth value lies
in the specific function of memory to preserve promises and
potentialities [love and support by the parent and carnal hopes]
which are betrayed and even outlawed by the mature, civilized
individual, but which he had once been fulfilled in his dim past
and which are never entirely forgotten.” “... all thinking ‘is
merely a detour from the memory of gratification ... memory of
gratification is at the origin of all thinking, and the impulse
to recapture past gratification is the hidden driven power
behind the process of thought.” (Marcuse). Brown writes about
memory as a cause for repression, when it is used to retain
patriarchal standards: “The core of the neurosis of individuals
lay in the ‘memory-traces of the experiences of former
generations.’” All this has changed, as several generations have
praxised the dialectical process in their homes. Irvin Yalom
writes: "The current generation is the first in the history of
the world which has nothing to learn from grandparents;" Irvin
Yalom Theory and Practice and Group Psychotherapy Thomas Kuhn
writes “A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing
its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because
its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that
is familiar with it.” Kuhn quoting Max Planck’s famous dictum.
Thomas Kuhn The Structure of Scientific Revolution
Excerpts from the mind of Freud reveal the use of phantasy as a
tool to activate "memory" “‘... phantasies of all person ...
infantile tendencies ... the sexual feeling of the child for the
parents.... the attraction of the son for the mother, and of the
daughter for the father.... with the overcoming and rejection of
these ...incestuous phantasies, ... one of the most painful
psychic accomplishment of puberty; ... the breaking away from
the parental authority, ... opposition between the new and old
generation ... important for cultural progress.’” Freud Three
Contributions to the Theory of Sex The language of phantasy
"dream language" is the language of "ought." Maslow in his book
The Farther Reaches of Human Nature wrote, "We have to study the
conditions which maximize ought-perceptiveness. Oughtiness is
itself a fact to be perceived. If we wish to permit the facts to
tell us their oughtiness, we must learn to listen to them in a
very specific way which can be called Taoistic. Discovering
one’s real nature is simultaneously an ought quest and an is
quest. An 'Ought-Is-Quest' is a religious quest in the
naturalistic sense. Is becomes the same as ought. Fact becomes
the same as value. The world which is becomes the world which
ought to be." Maslow. Karl Marx recognized the same nature in
mankind: “In short, philosophy as theory finds the ‘ought’
implied within the ‘is’, and as praxis seeks to make the two
coincide.” Joseph O’Malley, summing up Marx in Marx's work
Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right'
Marcuse wrote that: “Phantasy ["ought"] plays a most decisive
function in the total mental structure: it links the deepest
layers of the unconscious with the highest products of
consciousness, the dream with the reality [the 'ought' with the
'is' negating the 'not,' a circumvention of restraining
commands] ... the perpetual but repressed ideas of the
collective and individual memory, the tabooed images of
freedom.” “Phantasy is cognitive in so far as it preserves the
truth of the Great Refusal, ... in so far as it protects, ...
the aspirations for the integral fulfillment of man and nature
... the ‘lower depth’ of instinctual gratification assumes a new
dignity.” Phantasy “... unit[s] the whole person, the universal
and particular under pleasure.” (Marcuse) Perversions, according
to Marcuse “show a deep affinity to phantasy” since phantasy is
“free from reality-testing” and “subordinated to the pleasure
principle alone” and can be aroused through “artistic
imagination.” (Imagination-"the act or power of forming a mental
image of something not present to the senses or never before
wholly perceived in reality" Merriam-Webster Dictionary)
Phantasy “links perversions with the images of integral freedom
and gratification.” (Marcuse)
“Casting down imaginations and every high thing that exalteth
itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity
every thought to the obedience of Christ.” 2 Corinthians 10:3-5
The "animalization" of the traditional home.
Redefining man as a "social animal."
"And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be
alone; I will make him an help meet for him." Genesis 2:18
Therefore, according to Brown, "Human consciousness can be
liberated from the parental (Oedipal) complex [sense of guilt]
only be being liberated from its cultural derivatives, the
paternalistic state and the patriarchal God." The reason for the
sense of guilt, so prevalent in western civilization, Brown
writes: "... appears to be historically connected with the rise
of patriarchal religion (for the Western development the Hebrews
are decisive)." (Brown) The sons (pleasure seeking sons) are
first driven off by the father. Their praxis, their natural
desire to "relate sensuously" with their mother was seen by the
father as perverse. Freud used the phrase
"polymorphous-perverse" in describing the child-mother praxis
(matriarchal paradigm) in light of the father praxis
(patriarchal paradigm). “Children are polymorphously perverse. .
. . by the standards of normal adult sexuality” (Brown) since
they naturally utilize “all ... the sex instincts [touch, taste,
sight, smell, sound] ... which do not serve or prepare for the
procreative function.” All such “... perversions thus express
rebellion against the subjugation of sexuality under the order
of procreation, and against the institutions which guarantee
this order.” (Marcuse) Brown put it this way: “The discarded
elements of infantile sexuality [all body parts] are, judged by
the standards of normal adult sexuality, perverse [erotic
activities] . . . if they are pursued as substitutes [not used
toward procreation].” Looking at it from the child's position
Brown writes “Normal adult sexuality, judged by the standard of
infantile sexuality, is an unnatural restriction of the erotic
potentialities of the human body.”
This is the neo-Marxist (Freud and Marx) lens, those who now
"serve" us in government, use to determine right and wrong
behavior. Therefore according to Brown “Parental discipline,
religious denunciation of bodily pleasure, . . . have all left
man overly docile, but secretly in his unconscious unconvinced,
and therefore neurotic.” Therefore, the "laws of the flesh" is
man's "Great Refusal." A "neurotic" condition is produced when
man's natural inclinations are blocked by "unrealistic"
(unnatural) demands, i.e. by God, parent, law. Therefore Brown
writes “According to Freud, the ultimate essence of our being is
erotic, and demands activity according to the
pleasure-principle.” “Fore-pleasure is the preliminary play with
all parts of the body, and represent a perpetuation of the pure
polymorphous perverse play of infantile sexuality.” The energy
or desire with which the human being pursues pleasure is the
pleasurable activity of an organ of the body. Infants are
absorbed in their own bodies; they are in love with themselves.
Infants know no guide except the pleasure-principle. Infants
have a richer sexual life than adults. In man, infantile
sexuality is repressed and never outgrown; repression, (and
consequently neurosis) distinguishes man from the other
animals.” (Brown) The quest is "To rediscover the animal in
man." Maslow believed the road to health began with the animal
trait of nudity. "It looks as if nudism is the first step toward
ultimate free-animality-humanism. Must encourage it. Nakedness
is absolutely right. So is the attack on antieroticism, the
Christian and Jewish foundations." Lowry The Journals of Abraham
Maslow Carl Rogers wrote: “The innermost core of man’s nature,
the base of his ‘animal nature,’ is positive in nature." “Maslow
puts up a vigorous case for man's animal nature . . .
anti-social emotions – hostility, jealousy, etc. – result from
frustration of more basic impulses for love and security and
belonging [Eros].” “Do we dare to generalize from this type of
experience that if we cut through deeply enough to our
organismic nature, that we find that man is a positive and
social animal? This is the suggestion from our clinical
experience.” Carl Rogers On becoming a person
"The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count
slackness; but is longsuffering to us–ward, not willing that any
should perish, but that all should come to repentance. But the
day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which
the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements
shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that
are therein shall be burned up. Seeing then that all these
things shall be dissolved, what manner of persons ought ye to be
in all holy conversation and godliness, Looking for and hasting
unto the coming of the day of God, wherein the heavens being on
fire shall be dissolved, and the elements shall melt with
fervent heat? Nevertheless we, according to his promise, look
for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness.
Wherefore, beloved, seeing that ye look for such things, be
diligent that ye may be found of him in peace, without spot, and
blameless." 2 Peter 3:9-14
The problem lies, according to Brown, in man's ability to
"promise." He wrote: “Nietzsche begins by defining man as the
‘animal that can promise.’” “The ability to promise involves the
loss of the natural animal forgetfulness of the past, which is
the precondition for healthy living in the present.” “Through
the ability to promise, the future is bound to the past.” “It is
what makes man responsible; it is his conscience.” “Man is the
animal which represses himself and which creates culture or
society in order to repress himself.” But, according to Brown
“Man is distinguished from animals not simply by culture, but
also by a desire to change his culture and so to change
himself.” It is this ability of man to change himself which
gives the socio-psychologists, i.e. the globalists, hope in
achieving world "peace." Marcuse, as Brown, promoted the
sensuous nature of man as the pathway out of repression. Marcuse
writes, concerning the use of two of man's "animalistic" senses
(quoting Freud), “The vicissitudes of the ‘proximity senses’
(smell and taste) ... is ‘much more a bodily, physical one,
hence also more akin to sexual pleasure' .... give, as it were,
unsublimated pleasure per se (and unrepressed disgust). They
relate (and separate) individuals immediately. Such immediacy is
incompatible with the effectiveness of organized domination,
with a society which ‘tends to isolate people, to put distance
between them, and to prevent spontaneous relationships and the
the natural animal-like expressions of such relations.'”
"Freud takes with absolute seriousness the proposition of Jesus:
‘Except ye become as little children, ye can in no wise enter
the kingdom of heaven.’” Norman O. Brown Life Against Death
According to Brown heaven can be found on earth: “In the words
of Thoreau: ‘We need pray for no higher heaven than the pure
senses can furnish, a purely sensuous life. Our present senses
are but rudiments of what they are destined to become.’” The
famous socio-psychologist Abraham Maslow wrote: "Heaven is
available to us now, and is all around us." Abraham Maslow
Maslow on Management “The foundation on which the man of the
future will be built is already there, in the repressed
unconscious; the foundation has to be recovered.” (Brown) Brown
writes: since “[s]exual instinct seeks union with objects in the
world....” and “[e]ros is fundamentally a desire for union
(being one) with objects in the world ... [e]ros is the
foundation of morality.” Therefore "... self-perfection
(narcissism) of the human individual is fulfilled in union with
the world in pleasure.” “Human perfection consists in an
expansion of the self until it enjoys the world as it enjoys
itself.” Any such praxis of Eros is "tabooed" in a patriarchal
society. Yet in a civilization of Eros (built upon sensitivity
training) a patriarchal society is seen as enslaving "the
pleasure ego by the reality ego" i.e. "enslaving" the children
and the mother by the father. Take note: this is the foundation
on which "hate" crimes are being defined and will be judged.
"Children ... have not acquired that sense of shame which,
according to the Biblical story, expelled mankind from Paradise
[seen as an act of hate], and which, presumably, would be
discarded if Paradise were regained." (Brown) The issue with all
these men was how to restore the Garden in Eden (Eden means
"pleasure"; "And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow
every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the
tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of
knowledge of good and evil." Genesis 2:9), a lifestyle of (p)leasure
and guaranteed sustenance ("the good life," the sensuous life).
But this time the world wants a garden of pleasure without God.
Consciousness, instead of being the watchman over a dangerous
and unpredictable lot of impulses, becomes the comfortable
inhabitant of a society of impulses and feelings and thoughts.
The individual increasingly comes to feel that this locus of
evaluation lies within himself [as Eve felt in the Garden in
Eden]. Individuals move not from a fixity through change to a
new fixity, though such a process is indeed possible. But
[through a] continuum from fixity to changingness, from rigid
structure to flow, from stasis to process [from absolutism-faith
to relativism-doubt]. The good life is not any fixed state
[found in obedience to God]. The good life is a process [found
in Satan's process as used in the Garden in Eden]. The direction
which constitutes the good life is psychological freedom to move
in any direction [where] the general qualities of this selected
direction appear to have a certain universality [Eros]. Doing
what ‘feels right’ proves to be a competent and trustworthy
guide to behavior which is truly satisfying. As we reach the
fork in the road. Thinking starts at that point. If we have the
power or authority to establish the necessary conditions, the
predicted behaviors will follow. We know how to change the
opinions of an individual in a selected direction, without his
ever becoming aware of the stimuli which changed his opinion
[this is the condition every one of our elected officials face
in a facilitated subcommittees striving for consensus]. Walden
Two [quotation of Skinner]: ‘Now that we know how positive
reinforcement works, and why negative doesn’t’ … ‘we can be more
deliberate and hence more successful in our cultural design.’
“We can achieve a sort of control under which the controlled,
though they are following a code much more scrupulously than was
ever the case under the old system, nevertheless feel free. They
are doing what they want to do, not what they are forced to do.
That’s the source of the tremendous power of positive
reinforcement—there’s no restraint and no revolt. By a careful
design, we control not the final behavior, but the inclination
to behavior—the motives, the desires, the wishes. The curious
thing is that in that case the question of freedom never arises.
. . .we will inevitably find ourselves moving toward the chosen
goal, and probably thinking that we ourselves desired it. …it
appears that some form of completely controlled society … is
coming. “We can choose to use our growing knowledge to enslave
people in ways never dreamed of before, depersonalizing them,
controlling them by means so carefully selected that they will
perhaps never be aware of their loss of personhood. The choice
is up to use, and the human race being what it is, we are likely
to stumble about, making at times some nearly disastrous value
choices, and at other times highly constructive ones.” Carl
Rogers On becoming a person
Marcuse & Freud
Dad and mom may not be perfect but the office is.
The liberal agenda is to negate the patriarchal office in the
thinking (theory) of every individual and in actions
(practice-praxis) of society.
"Children, obey your parents in the Lord: for this is right.
Honour thy father and mother; (which is the first commandment
with promise;) That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest
live long on the earth. And, ye fathers, provoke not your
children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and
admonition of the Lord. Servants, be obedient to them that are
your masters according to the flesh, with fear and trembling, in
singleness of your heart, as unto Christ; Not with eyeservice,
as menpleasers; but as the servants of Christ, doing the will of
God from the heart; With good will doing service, as to the
Lord, and not to men: Knowing that whatsoever good thing any man
doeth, the same shall he receive of the Lord, whether he be bond
or free. And, ye masters, do the same things unto them,
forbearing threatening: knowing that your Master also is in
heaven; neither is there respect of persons with him." Ephesians
6:1-9
Liberals may not like the concept of being servant to any
master. Yet they refuse to recognize themselves as being
servants to their master, the flesh and the prince of the power
of the air. They, by their nature, seek to be masters over
others, making them servants. How many people pay taxes to
support this process against their will and their conscience for
fear of the liberals punishing them with fines and imprisonment.
The American citizen is now servant to their master Eros and
unfortunately most love it.
The Sexual Revolution
"If it feels good, just do it." Herbert Marcuse Eros and
Civilization
"And, Let every one that nameth the name of Christ depart from
iniquity. But in a great house there are not only vessels of
gold and of silver, but also of wood and of earth; and some to
honour, and some to dishonour. If a man therefore purge himself
from these, he shall be a vessel unto honour, sanctified, and
meet for the master’s use, and prepared unto every good work.
Flee also youthful lusts:" 2 Timothy 2: 19-22a
Fleshly desires are subject to a higher authority, the sons are
subject to the father's will, his commands. "Thy will be done on
earth, as in heaven." All this is against their own natural
inclination of relationship with the one whom they love—the
mother, natural resources, the beauty of the cosmos. Following
the Gnostic story, man is now subject to God's will (demiurge),
he is thus repressed. This subordination to a higher authority,
against a persons natural inclination, splits (alienates) man
from his "rightful" (sinful) relation with nature, the
creation—Sophia, "mother earth," Gaia, the cosmic forces.
Marcuse reveals the danger which lies in Freud's line of
reasoning: "A society which employs sexuality as means for a
useful end, the perversions upheld sexuality as an end in
itself; they thus place themselves outside the domain of the
performance principle [obedience toward God, parent, commander,
law of the land, the very essence of sovereignty] and challenge
its very foundation.” This is a mandate to execute patricide and
a call to perform incest. Remember that Freud is not calling sex
the act of procreation (he called the praxis of procreation
castration). “In terms of the pleasure principles ...
reproduction is merely a ‘by-product.” (Marcuse) Sex, to Freud,
was the orgiastic, Dionysian, sensuousness of touch, taste,
sight, smell, sound, seeking expression (Orpheus) and unity
(Narcissus) with that Dr. Kinsey interviewing a respondent to
his survey.with which the senses are "naturally" drawn through
(Eros). The pathway of "world peace," including the church, is
via Eros. “Dionysus affirms the dialectical unity of the great
instinctual opposites: reunifies male and female, Self and
Others, life and death.” (Brown) Thus adultery, homosexuality,
lesbianism, pedophilia, etc. can be justified as forms of
expressing love (tolerated), and thus can become the core of
social unity. Any opposition would be labeled as hate, as the
trend is today. Alfred Charles Kinsey, a Rockefeller, federally
funded pedophile, noted for his "Kinsey Report," coined the
phrase sexual revolution. His defense of homosexuality assisted
the American Psychiatric Association in removing homosexually
from their list of mental illnesses. Wilhelm Reich, a Marxist,
who advocated a guilt-free sex life, promoted Freud's perverse
agenda in America. In light of this definition of sex and
according to those using sensitivity training to bring peace and
harmony upon the earth, what Satan got Eve to praxis in the
Garden in Eden ("polymorphic-perverse" behavior) is the desired
outcome for every person on the face of the earth. As stated
before it is not how far down the path you have traveled that
matters, you may have just started and all seems well, it is the
path that you are on.
"Closure"
"But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for
whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil." Matthew 5:7
"Vanity of vanities, saith the preacher; all is vanity."
"Rejoice, O young man, in thy youth; and let thy heart cheer
thee in the days of thy youth, and walk in the ways of thine
heart, and in the sight of thine eyes: but know thou, that for
all these things God will bring thee into judgment. Therefore
remove sorrow from thy heart, and put away evil from thy flesh:
for childhood and youth are vanity." "Let us hear the conclusion
of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for
this is the whole duty of man. For God shall bring every work
into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or
whether it be evil." Ecclesiastes 1:2; 11:9, 10; 12:13, 14
"What can I get out of this relationship for myself?"
"From whence come wars and fightings among you? come they not
hence, even of your lusts that war in your members? Ye lust, and
have not: ye kill, and desire to have, and cannot obtain: ye
fight and war, yet ye have not, because ye ask not. Ye ask, and
receive not, because ye ask amiss, that ye may consume it upon
your lusts. Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the
friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore
will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God. Do ye think
that the scripture saith in vain, The spirit that dwelleth in us
lusteth to envy? But he giveth more grace. Wherefore he saith,
God resisteth the proud, but giveth grace unto the humble.
Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he
will flee from you. Draw nigh to God, and he will draw nigh to
you. Cleanse your hands, ye sinners; and purify your hearts, ye
double minded. Be afflicted, and mourn, and weep: let your
laughter be turned to mourning, and your joy to heaviness.
Humble yourselves in the sight of the Lord, and he shall lift
you up." James 4:1-10
"If I could only ...."
The Apostle Paul under house arrest for two years ... money
would have set him free. Acts 24:22-27
Does anyone notice these trends in the "church" today?
"de-ceit"
The Seat!
To chasten, to spank for doing wrong.
Patricide: either there is no father in the family or he does
not act like one.
"‘It is not really a decisive matter whether one has killed
one’s father or abstained from the deed,’ if the function of the
conflict and its consequences are the same .” Herbert Marcuse
Eros and Civilization, quoting Sigmund Freud
Paraphrase:
It does not really matter whether the family no longer has a
father (God) or he is present as long as the "family" is not
restrained by the act of chastening (negative "force field"). In
other words, the fear of judgment from either a heavenly father
or an earthly father is no longer justifiable in the life
(praxis) and the thoughts (theory) of the "earthly family."
“Once the earthly family [which chastens] is discovered to be
the secret of the heavenly family [which chastens] the former
must itself be annihilated, both in theory and in practice
[chastening no longer accepted as proper behavior in the
thoughts, the theory, of each individual and in the life, the
praxis, of the community "family"].” Karl Marx Feuerbach Thesis
#4
"When a man has finally reached the point where he does not
think he knows it better than others, that is when he has become
indifferent to what they have done badly and he is interested
only in what they have done right, then peace and affirmation
have come to him."
G. F. W. Hegel, in one of the casual notes preserved at Widener.
Psychology is all about the negation of the patriarch (negative)
and the promotion of incest (positive). This is Abomination in
the eyes of the Lord.
To see a child spanked is not a pleasant thing in the eyes of
the world, for "boys will be boys." Satan knew that the world
would back this one.
Regarding spanking, a friend of mine shared about a woman with a
key chain which read : "I'm not mean, your a sissy."
"For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son
whom he receiveth. If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you
as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not?
But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers,
then are ye bastards, and not sons." Hebrews 12:6-8
Some of my sources:
All scriptures from the King James Authorized Bible (which
labels me as a traditionalist.)
(Adorno) Theodor Adorno The Authoritarian Personality
(Bronner) Stephen Eric Bronner Of Critical Theory and Its
Theorists
(Brown) Norman O. Brown Life Against Death
James Coleman The Adolescent Society
Erich Fromm Escape from Freedom
(Marcuse) Herbert Marcuse Eros and Civilization, 1955
© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 2007
"When I thought to know this, it was too painful for me; Until
I went into the sanctuary of God; then understood I their end.
Surely thou didst set them in slippery places: thou castedst
them down into destruction. How are they brought into
desolation, as in a moment! they are utterly consumed with
terrors. As a dream when one awaketh; so, O Lord, when thou
awakest, thou shalt despise their image.
Whom have I in heaven but thee? and there is none upon earth
that I desire beside thee. My flesh and my heart faileth: but
God is the strength of my heart, and my portion for ever. For,
lo, they that are far from thee shall perish: thou hast
destroyed all them that go a whoring from thee. But it is good
for me to draw near to God: I have put my trust in the Lord GOD,
that I may declare all thy works." Psalms 73:16-20, 25-28
More
will be added.
Some of my sources:
All scriptures from
the King James Authorized Bible (which labels me as
a traditionalist.)
(Adorno)
Theodor Adorno The Authoritarian Personality
(Bronner) Stephen Eric Bronner Of Critical
Theory and Its Theorists
(Brown) Norman O. Brown Life Against Death
James Coleman The Adolescent
Society
Erich Fromm Escape from Freedom
(Marcuse) Herbert Marcuse Eros and Civilization,
1955
© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher
2007
http://authorityresearch.com/2007-08%20%20Didactic%20or%20Dialectic%20and%20their%20praxis-to%20obey%20or%20circumvent.htm